Is there any good reason why prototyped PCC subs
shouldn't be callable with IMC syntax that looks like
a macro call, without having to make a macro wrapper
manually? (I know its not the way it works now, but
you can almost simulate it with a PCC sub def and a
macro, and it seems to me it would be
I was already talking to Leo offline a bit about refactoring some
of the IMCC syntax. We have incrementally added some
features at different times that could be handled with a more
compact syntax if we rework it.
1) Combine .pcc_sub and .sub and go back to using
the single keyword .sub.
*This
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any good reason why prototyped PCC subs
shouldn't be callable with IMC syntax that looks like
a macro call, without having to make a macro wrapper
manually?
Could be done, but for sure unlikely. PASM/PIR are still assembler
languages. You can
Leo --
The Jako compiler spits stuff out from Perl.
I'm writing some new experimental stuff in PIR directly.
I'm curious about other stuff, too. I don't see any
of the languages/imcc/t/**/*.t files doing anything with
the ord op, and when I try to use it as
.local int c
.local str s
and
Gregor N. Purdy writes:
Leo --
The Jako compiler spits stuff out from Perl.
I'm writing some new experimental stuff in PIR directly.
I'm curious about other stuff, too. I don't see any
of the languages/imcc/t/**/*.t files doing anything with
the ord op, and when I try to use it as
Luke --
Yeah. That falls into the duh category, I guess.
But, I'm still having some trouble:
.pcc_sub _consume_string prototyped
.param str input
.local int c
.local int test
.local Sub __char_is_white_space
newsub __char_is_white_space, .Sub, _char_is_white_space
.local Sub
Gregor N. Purdy writes:
Luke --
Yeah. That falls into the duh category, I guess.
But, I'm still having some trouble:
.pcc_sub _consume_string prototyped
.param str input
.param string input
Now the error makes sense.
.local int c
.local int test
.local Sub
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.local str s
a lot of problems you have (and Luke already hinted at that) seems to be
the syntax of .sym (or .local) - I prefer .sym because .local is used
for local macro lables too hysterically.
So we have:
.sym int I_REG
.sym
