RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
Cygwin is fine. Although I still have to change the makefile to get make test to work right. -Original Message- From: Simon Cozens To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/3/2001 9:55 AM Subject: Parrot 0.0.2 Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? -- I'm a person

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
that cygwin really thinks there is something to do. -Original Message- From: Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs To: 'Simon Cozens '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' Sent: 10/3/2001 10:12 AM Subject: RE: Parrot 0.0.2 Cygwin is fine. Although I still have to change the makefile to get make test to work right

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Simon Cozens wrote: On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 03:55:55PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? FWIW, I've just successfully built Parrot on Linux x86, Linux Sparc, Linux IA64, Tru64, Linux Alpha, FreeBSD Alpha, and

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 11:44 am, Andy Dougherty wrote: Finally, trying a 32-bit opcode_t and a 64-bit INTVAL, I get Mixed sizes are completely hosed. But we need to decide how they should behave before we start randomly applying bandaids. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 11:44:25AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: It's not a core platform, but Linux/Sparc (intvalsize=8) is still not very happy: OK; I'll have to check that out. The Sparc I have here has intvalsize=4 by default. -- Contrariwise, continued Tweedledee, if it was so, it might

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread H . Merijn Brand
On Wed 03 Oct 2001 16:55, Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? HP-UX 11.00 w/ HP ANSI C -DDEBUGGING -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE -I/pro/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I./include l1:/pro/3gl/CPAN/parrot 112

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:52:19PM +0200, H. Merijn Brand wrote: HP-UX 11.00 w/ HP ANSI C -DDEBUGGING -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE -I/pro/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I./include Thanks. Also: $ uname -a SunOS neptune 5.8 Generic_108528-10 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 How

[PATCH] printf bandaids (Was Re: Parrot 0.0.2)

2001-10-03 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Simon Cozens wrote: On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 11:44:25AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: It's not a core platform, but Linux/Sparc (intvalsize=8) is still not very happy: OK; I'll have to check that out. The Sparc I have here has intvalsize=4 by default. Perhaps I'm too

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Brent Dax
Simon Cozens: # Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? Win2K non-Cygwin is looking a little sick to its stomach: Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195] (C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp. C:\Brent\Visual Studio Projects\Perl 6\parrot\parrotpmake test

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:39:32AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: Win2K non-Cygwin is looking a little sick to its stomach: Dammit. There had to be a show-stopper, didn't there? -- The Blit is a nice terminal, but it runs emacs.

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: FWIW, Linux/x86 long long/long double/long long has a few glitches. That's a good test platform because sizeof(long double) is 12 there, while sizeof(long long) is 8, but Parrot/Opcode.pm still seems to assume $nvivsize =

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
Simon -- Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? I'm about to post a patch that fixes macros in the assembler, and along the way adds label arithmetic, which allows t/basic.t to have all tests enabled (and passing). I'd like to have a working macro facility in the

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
OK, let's try and clear this up. On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:39:32AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: # got: 'Seem to have negative Nx not ok ' # expected: 'Seem to have negative Nx Seem to have positive Nx after pop ' Don't know what's going on here. t/op/string.NOK 4#

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:53:40PM -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote: I'd like to have a working macro facility in the assembler for 0.0.2, please. Don't worry, Windows being broken has bought you some time... -- In space 'cat scream.au | tee /dev/null /dev/audio'... - Ben, in the monastery.

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:51:14PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: # got: 'Seem to have negative Nx not ok # expected: 'Seem to have negative Nx Seem to have positive Nx after pop So pop_n is broken on Win32. Did you see any compiler warnings in the stacks code? -- perl -le

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Gregor N. Purdy
Simon -- Don't worry, Windows being broken has bought you some time... I don't really need time (since its done). But, I'll take this as go ahead and commit it when you're ready (which is now). Regards, -- Gregor _ /

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Brent Dax
Simon Cozens: # On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:51:14PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: # # got: 'Seem to have negative Nx # not ok # # expected: 'Seem to have negative Nx # Seem to have positive Nx after pop # # So pop_n is broken on Win32. Did you see any compiler warnings # in the

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Brent Dax
--Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configure pumpking for Perl 6 They *will* pay for what they've done. # -Original Message- # From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] # Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 09:51 # To: Brent Dax # Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Subject: Re: Parrot 0.0.2

RE: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Benjamin Stuhl
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Subject: Re: Parrot 0.0.2 # # # OK, let's try and clear this up. # # On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:39:32AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote: # # got: 'Seem to have negative Nx # not ok # ' # # expected: 'Seem to have negative Nx # Seem to have positive Nx after

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:08:54PM -0700, Benjamin Stuhl wrote: # got: 'failure ' What no debugging print output? -- We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise. -- Larry Wall

Re: Parrot 0.0.2

2001-10-03 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Cozens) writes: Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking? except that `make test` always just tells me tat `test' is up to date, then both cygwin and darwin looks good. - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();