Cygwin is fine. Although I still have to change the makefile to get make
test to work right.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Cozens
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10/3/2001 9:55 AM
Subject: Parrot 0.0.2
Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking?
--
I'm a person
that cygwin really thinks there is something to do.
-Original Message-
From: Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
To: 'Simon Cozens '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Sent: 10/3/2001 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Parrot 0.0.2
Cygwin is fine. Although I still have to change the makefile to get
make
test to work right
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 03:55:55PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking?
FWIW, I've just successfully built Parrot on Linux x86, Linux Sparc,
Linux IA64, Tru64, Linux Alpha, FreeBSD Alpha, and
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 11:44 am, Andy Dougherty wrote:
Finally, trying a 32-bit opcode_t and a 64-bit INTVAL, I get
Mixed sizes are completely hosed. But we need to decide how they should
behave before we start randomly applying bandaids.
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 11:44:25AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
It's not a core platform, but Linux/Sparc (intvalsize=8) is still not
very happy:
OK; I'll have to check that out. The Sparc I have here has intvalsize=4
by default.
--
Contrariwise, continued Tweedledee, if it was so, it might
On Wed 03 Oct 2001 16:55, Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking?
HP-UX 11.00 w/ HP ANSI C
-DDEBUGGING -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE -I/pro/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I./include
l1:/pro/3gl/CPAN/parrot 112
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:52:19PM +0200, H. Merijn Brand wrote:
HP-UX 11.00 w/ HP ANSI C
-DDEBUGGING -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE -I/pro/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I./include
Thanks. Also:
$ uname -a
SunOS neptune 5.8 Generic_108528-10 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
How
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 11:44:25AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
It's not a core platform, but Linux/Sparc (intvalsize=8) is still not
very happy:
OK; I'll have to check that out. The Sparc I have here has intvalsize=4
by default.
Perhaps I'm too
Simon Cozens:
# Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking?
Win2K non-Cygwin is looking a little sick to its stomach:
Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Brent\Visual Studio Projects\Perl 6\parrot\parrotpmake test
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:39:32AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote:
Win2K non-Cygwin is looking a little sick to its stomach:
Dammit. There had to be a show-stopper, didn't there?
--
The Blit is a nice terminal, but it runs emacs.
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
FWIW, Linux/x86 long long/long double/long long has a few glitches.
That's a good test platform because sizeof(long double) is 12 there, while
sizeof(long long) is 8, but Parrot/Opcode.pm still seems to assume
$nvivsize =
Simon --
Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking?
I'm about to post a patch that fixes macros in the assembler, and
along the way adds label arithmetic, which allows t/basic.t to have
all tests enabled (and passing).
I'd like to have a working macro facility in the
OK, let's try and clear this up.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:39:32AM -0700, Brent Dax wrote:
# got: 'Seem to have negative Nx
not ok
'
# expected: 'Seem to have negative Nx
Seem to have positive Nx after pop
'
Don't know what's going on here.
t/op/string.NOK 4#
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:53:40PM -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
I'd like to have a working macro facility in the assembler for 0.0.2,
please.
Don't worry, Windows being broken has bought you some time...
--
In space 'cat scream.au | tee /dev/null /dev/audio'...
- Ben, in the monastery.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:51:14PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
# got: 'Seem to have negative Nx
not ok
# expected: 'Seem to have negative Nx
Seem to have positive Nx after pop
So pop_n is broken on Win32. Did you see any compiler warnings
in the stacks code?
--
perl -le
Simon --
Don't worry, Windows being broken has bought you some time...
I don't really need time (since its done). But, I'll take this as
go ahead and commit it when you're ready (which is now).
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/
Simon Cozens:
# On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:51:14PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
# # got: 'Seem to have negative Nx
# not ok
# # expected: 'Seem to have negative Nx
# Seem to have positive Nx after pop
#
# So pop_n is broken on Win32. Did you see any compiler warnings
# in the
--Brent Dax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configure pumpking for Perl 6
They *will* pay for what they've done.
# -Original Message-
# From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
# Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 09:51
# To: Brent Dax
# Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Subject: Re: Parrot 0.0.2
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Subject: Re: Parrot 0.0.2
#
#
# OK, let's try and clear this up.
#
# On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:39:32AM -0700, Brent Dax
wrote:
# # got: 'Seem to have negative Nx
# not ok
# '
# # expected: 'Seem to have negative Nx
# Seem to have positive Nx after
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:08:54PM -0700, Benjamin Stuhl wrote:
# got: 'failure
'
What no debugging print output?
--
We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on
when it's necessary to compromise.
-- Larry Wall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Cozens) writes:
Any objections to a release today? How's Cygwin and Win32 looking?
except that `make test` always just tells me tat `test' is up to date,
then both cygwin and darwin looks good.
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
21 matches
Mail list logo