Bill Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo,
Thanks for your suggestions and comments.
Welcome and thanks to you for looking at that nasty piece of code ;)
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:35:04 +0200, Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some remargs WRT gen{3,4}.pl:
1) While these programs
On Oct 20, 2004, at 11:24 PM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Bill Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And of course, lexicals and globals already have a storage, you don't
need to spill them.
I'm not sure that's true. If there's no 'eval' in scope, lexicals don't
have to live in pads--they could purely
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2004, at 11:24 PM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
And of course, lexicals and globals already have a storage, you don't
need to spill them.
I'm not sure that's true.
It should read: if there are lexical or global opcodes, lexicals and
globals have a
On Oct 21, 2004, at 4:13 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2004, at 11:24 PM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
And of course, lexicals and globals already have a storage, you don't
need to spill them.
I'm not sure that's true.
It should read: if there are lexical
At 9:24 AM -0700 10/21/04, Jeff Clites wrote:
I think there'll be two types of tie--tied variables (like Perl has
already), and tied namespaces (as supposedly some people really
need, though I don't fully know why). But even without the above
pathological case: with tied namespaces, a namespace
Leo,
Thanks for your suggestions and comments.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:35:04 +0200, Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some remargs WRT gen{3,4}.pl:
1) While these programs exhibit some worst case register layout it's
probably not a very typical layout.
Agreed. The idea was to
Hello All,
This is my first post to the parrot list, but I hope that many will
follow. Thanks to all of you for working so dilligently on building
this wonderful new toy for all us geeks to play with!
I am currently working on a fix to the large subroutine register
allocation bug, aka, massive
At 4:58 PM -0700 10/2/04, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
Dan et al. --
I made a new version of the script that creates gen.cpp and gen.imc
(attached). You can run it like this:
perl gen-pra.pl 1000 1
(for 1000 labels and 1 variables) and it will create equivalent
gen.imc and gen.cpp files. You
Dan et al. --
I made a new version of the script that creates gen.cpp and gen.imc
(attached). You can run it like this:
perl gen-pra.pl 1000 1
(for 1000 labels and 1 variables) and it will create equivalent
gen.imc and gen.cpp files. You can test-compile them with these
commands:
g++
