Bob Rogers wrote:
From: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep - that's still doable, but not in the middle, which looks insane to
me anyway.
Not always, seems to me. Sometimes, in order to implement a defined
protocol (e.g. for a callback), you must accept a parameter that you
On 6/14/05, Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.sub __add
.param MyType $P0 :flags(0x40) # or @flags(0x40)? - inv. w/o colon
(e.g.)
.param $I0 :flags(0x20) # invocant with colon (e.g.)
...
What do you think?
I think the typecodes are unnecessary with a
From: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:48:06 +0200
Bob Rogers wrote:
. . .
To ignore a parameter, simply don't fetch it. To ignore a return,
simply don't supply a register for it.
Yep - that's still doable, but not in the middle, which
