RE: [PATCH] rx.dev

2002-07-17 Thread Melvin Smith
At 06:14 PM 7/16/2002 -0700, John Porter wrote: Melvin Smith wrote: I put it temporarily in the root dir, which I know is wrong. Where should .dev files go, anyway? Actually, I think that's right. ..dev files live alongside their .c/.h siblings, no? Hmm, looking at the source directory,

RE: [PATCH] rx.dev

2002-07-17 Thread John Porter
Melvin Smith wrote: Hmm, looking at the source directory, I'm starting to think maybe that isn't so good, it is pretty busy already. We have one vote for a /dev directory. Actually, I think Dan did -- or at least was going to do -- something about this last night. Part of it was to shove

RE: [PATCH] rx.dev

2002-07-17 Thread Daniel Grunblatt
We have one vote for docs/dev. Daniel Grunblatt. On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Melvin Smith wrote: At 06:14 PM 7/16/2002 -0700, John Porter wrote: Melvin Smith wrote: I put it temporarily in the root dir, which I know is wrong. Where should .dev files go, anyway? Actually, I think that's

RE: [PATCH] rx.dev

2002-07-16 Thread Stephen Rawls
Ok, I cleaned up the file a little bit, and added pod declarations. Should be finalized or close to it at least. If anyone likes it, I'll start working on making a .dev file for some other files, and start asking questions while I'm at it probably :) Stephen Rawls

RE: [PATCH] rx.dev

2002-07-16 Thread Melvin Smith
At 05:08 PM 7/15/2002 -0700, Stephen Rawls wrote: Ok, I cleaned up the file a little bit, and added pod declarations. Should be finalized or close to it at least. If anyone likes it, I'll start working on making a .dev file for some other files, and start asking questions while I'm at it

RE: [PATCH] rx.dev

2002-07-16 Thread John Porter
Melvin Smith wrote: I put it temporarily in the root dir, which I know is wrong. Where should .dev files go, anyway? Actually, I think that's right. ..dev files live alongside their .c/.h siblings, no? -- JohnDouglasPorter __ Do You Yahoo!?

Re: [PATCH] rx.dev

2002-07-16 Thread Josh Wilmes
Well, the .h files live elsewhere, but yeah, for now I think .dev files should live with the .c files. Unless someone has an alternative suggestion. I'll update make check_source and pdd07 to reflect this. --Josh At 18:14 on 07/16/2002 PDT, John Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Melvin

RE: [PATCH] rx.dev

2002-07-14 Thread Brent Dax
Stephen Rawls: # I've only been involved with parrot since last week, # but I've been learning quickly from all the # documentation. With the recent activity about lack of # documentation, I thought I'd try to help out as best I could. # I've attached a file for an rx.dev candidate. # Some