Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2004 23:39 schrieb Leopold Toetsch:
>>
>> I'll have a look at that _init call tomorrow - albeit _init (it was that
>> name IIRC) could be a too commonly used label. _library_init or such
>> could be better.
> That sounds reas
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2004 23:39 schrieb Leopold Toetsch:
> Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Me too. There's supposed to be a magic initialization sub of some kind
> > called on library load. I'm inclined to stick it in there, but it's not
> > there yet.
>
> I'll have a look at
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2004 05:54 schrieb chromatic:
> On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:57, Jens Rieks wrote:
> > here is an easy to use (with PIR code) wrapper of the SDL library.
> > It tries to hide all internals of the wrapper and makes the most
> > important SDL functions directly available i
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Me too. There's supposed to be a magic initialization sub of some kind
> called on library load. I'm inclined to stick it in there, but it's not
> there yet.
I'll have a look at that _init call tomorrow - albeit _init (it was that
name IIRC) could be a too
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 10:20, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> I really dislike having to .include sdl.imc in a sub to .include the
> other outside...
Me too. There's supposed to be a magic initialization sub of some kind
called on library load. I'm inclined to stick it in there, but it's not
there yet.
chromatic wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:57, Jens Rieks wrote:
> > here is an easy to use (with PIR code) wrapper of the SDL library.
> > It tries to hide all internals of the wrapper and makes the most
> > important SDL functions directly available in PIR code.
> Overall this looks good.
[sni
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:57, Jens Rieks wrote:
> here is an easy to use (with PIR code) wrapper of the SDL library.
> It tries to hide all internals of the wrapper and makes the most important
> SDL functions directly available in PIR code.
Overall this looks good. I am not sure if it is better
