Re: [PATCH] Misc PDD 07 nits

2002-03-22 Thread Josh Wilmes
At 11:34 on 03/22/2002 EST, "Bryan C. Warnock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 22 March 2002 11:23, Josh Wilmes wrote: > > > > > > This doesn't agree with how we've been doing cpp directive indenting in > > two ways. > > I was just fixing various format problems. There's a *lot* in th

Re: [PATCH] Misc PDD 07 nits

2002-03-22 Thread Bryan C. Warnock
On Friday 22 March 2002 11:23, Josh Wilmes wrote: > > > This doesn't agree with how we've been doing cpp directive indenting in > two ways. I was just fixing various format problems. There's a *lot* in the PDD that doesn't match what we're doing. Bad bad bad, on many many many people. We n

Re: [PATCH] Misc PDD 07 nits [APPLIED]

2002-03-22 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:52 AM -0500 3/22/02, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: >Missing tags and bad indents. Applied, thanks. -- Dan --"it's like this"--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH] Misc PDD 07 nits

2002-03-22 Thread Josh Wilmes
Bryan, this is good stuff! One question though- in this section of the patch: > - /* file header comments */ > - > - #if !defined(PARROT__H_GUARD) > - #define PARROT__H_GUARD > - > - /* body of file */ > - > - #endif /* PARROT__H_GUARD */ > +/* file header comments */ > + > +#if !d