Re: [PATCH] Build system command line options

2003-09-10 Thread Arthur Bergman
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 05:40 pm, Brent Dax wrote: Got something a bit better. Parrot Configure has had syntax for modifying settings without removing them for a long time: :add{foo} :rem{foo} Until now, it only worked when Configure prompted you interactively for th

RE: [PATCH] Build system command line options

2003-09-10 Thread Brent Dax
Arthur Bergman: # Currently if you specify cc and ld flag options at the command line it # totally overrides the ones it finds, this seems non DWIM and non # optimal. This little patch fixes it. Got something a bit better. Parrot Configure has had syntax for modifying settings without removing th

Re: [PATCH]Build system

2003-08-21 Thread Vladimir Lipskiy
> Could it be that your source contains traces of your #define patches? I've found a blunder in my patch. I'll fix it in a minute.

Re: [PATCH]Build system

2003-08-21 Thread Vladimir Lipskiy
> interpreter.c:25: parrot/oplib/core_ops_cg.h: No such file or directory > interpreter.c:26: parrot/oplib/core_ops_cgp.h: No such file or directory > make: *** [interpreter.o] Error 1 > > Could it be that your source contains traces of your #define patches? I deleted all changes that I made and

Re: [PATCH]Build system

2003-08-21 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Vladimir Lipskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch deals with only classes/*.pmc dependies. And I have no idea > how to search out other missing dependies. interpreter.c:25: parrot/oplib/core_ops_cg.h: No such file or directory interpreter.c:26: parrot/oplib/core_ops_cgp.h: No such file or d

Re: [PATCH] Build system tweaks.

2001-10-17 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 09:08:32AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > ops2c and ops2pm need to make sure the directory for the output file > > exists before trying to create any files in that directory. > > This is still true. Patch reproduced below.

Re: [PATCH] Build system tweaks.

2001-10-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Andy Dougherty wrote: > Also, I changed t/Makefile to use the correct $(PERL) version. > (But aren't those cd t; make ... commands going to give Win32 fits?) This is also still needed, but since the relevant files have moved to examples/assembly, I've updated the patch: dif

Re: [PATCH] Build system tweaks.

2001-10-17 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Andy Dougherty wrote: > ops2c and ops2pm need to make sure the directory for the output file > exists before trying to create any files in that directory. This is still true. Patch reproduced below. > diff -r -u parrot/ops2c.pl parrot-andy/ops2c.pl > --- parrot/ops2c.pl

Re: [PATCH] Build system tweaks.

2001-10-15 Thread Tom Hughes
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, but they are empty, and there are no relevant entries in MANIFEST. > Thus, if you try to make a copy of the parrot source tree in another > directory based on the contents of the MANIFEST file, you'll get a

Re: [PATCH] Build system tweaks.

2001-10-15 Thread Andy Dougherty
In perl.perl6.internals, you wrote: >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> ops2c and ops2pm need to make sure the directory for the output file >> exists before trying to create any files in that directory. > >Well actually cvs should have created

Re: [PATCH] Build system tweaks.

2001-10-15 Thread Tom Hughes
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ops2c and ops2pm need to make sure the directory for the output file > exists before trying to create any files in that directory. Well actually cvs should have created the directories when you updated, so long