Re: Constant operator overloading

2001-10-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:02 AM 10/3/2001 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: >On Wednesday 03 October 2001 10:57 am, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Having said that, if you're looking to add optimizations into the > > assembler, you're probably OK, but I'm not sure it's worth the effort at > > the moment. > >Investigating what

Re: Constant operator overloading

2001-10-03 Thread Bryan C . Warnock
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 10:57 am, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Having said that, if you're looking to add optimizations into the > assembler, you're probably OK, but I'm not sure it's worth the effort at > the moment. Investigating what effect a non-duplicated, non-overridable set of opcodes (name

Re: Constant operator overloading

2001-10-03 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:51 AM 10/3/2001 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: >Is there anything that might alter an operation involving only constants >and/or the constant registers at a time other than compile time (ie, when >the opcode is generated.)? For integer, string, and float constants (i.e. I, N, and S regs) n