At 02:45 PM 11/17/00 +, David Grove wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:19 AM 11/17/00 -0800, Ken Fox wrote:
However, I don't want to see early (premature) adoption of fundamental
pieces like the VM or parser. It makes sense to me to explore many
possible
At 10:19 AM 11/17/00 -0800, Ken Fox wrote:
However, I don't want to see early (premature) adoption of fundamental
pieces like the VM or parser. It makes sense to me to explore many possible
designs and pick and choose between them. Also, if we can keep external API
design separate from internal
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:19 AM 11/17/00 -0800, Ken Fox wrote:
However, I don't want to see early (premature) adoption of fundamental
pieces like the VM or parser. It makes sense to me to explore many
possible
designs and pick and choose between them. Also, if we can
"David Grove" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
But.. but... but... we don't even have a design spec. I mean, we don't
even know for sure what Perl 6 is going to look like for certain, inside
or outside.
This is precisely why I proposed the BS level just below Development. In fact I'm
going to
Using the IBM article that Jarkko found as an example, core implementations of
different languages may have more in common with each other
than implemetations of the same language,
I think PPC is actually significant enough so that it should not be painted into a
perl-only corner.
Seeing
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 04:20:58PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
I want perl 6's internal API to have the same sort of artistic integrity
that the language has. That's not, unfortunately, possible with everyone
having equal say. I'd like it to be otherwise, but that's just not possible
with
Nat and I argued parts of this (I think this is included) at some length.
Actually, I think I drove him crazy getting specifics out of this.
Adam Turoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 05:59:40PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
6) Only a WG chair, pumpking, or one of the
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 11:35:56AM -0500, Adam Turoff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 05:59:40PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
6) Only a WG chair, pumpking, or one of the principals (i.e. Me, Nat, or
Larry, or our replacements) can mark a PDD as developing, standard, or
superceded.
This
