On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Will Coleda wrote:
> Good! [inline] isn't real Tcl, it's specific to partcl.
>
> That test consists of the code:
>
> inline PASM {
>print "ok\n"
> }
>
> which should do the obvious thing. Odd that it's squawking about MMD_add.
It's very strange. It copied that snip
Good! [inline] isn't real Tcl, it's specific to partcl.
That test consists of the code:
inline PASM {
print "ok\n"
}
which should do the obvious thing. Odd that it's squawking about
MMD_add.
Can you 1) try this PIR, and 2) if that *works*, copy that tcl
snippet to "examples/foo.tcl"
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Will Coleda wrote:
> Done. All tests pass for tcl in leo-ctx5. (And with leo's recent fixes,
> hopefully this means on all platforms for real this time. =-)
>
> This should also fix the problem on windows, as the missing functions have
> been uncommented, and are now availabl
I can confirm that all tests are now passing on Linux/x86 with r9202.
--
All tests successful.
Files=47, Tests=446, 40 wallclock secs (28.78 cusr + 4.18 csys = 32.96 CPU)
--
-J
--
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:24:09PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
> Done. All tests pass for tcl in leo-ctx5. (And with
Done. All tests pass for tcl in leo-ctx5. (And with leo's recent
fixes, hopefully this means on all platforms for real this time. =-)
This should also fix the problem on windows, as the missing functions
have been uncommented, and are now available.
Please svn up and retest.
On Sep 15, 200
