On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Jonathan Worthington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerry gay wrote:
>>
>> seems to me this is trying to test whether there's a defined value in
>> $!.
>
> Testing truth falls back to definedness, yes.
>
>> however, you've jumped straight into blaming parrot's Excepti
jerry gay wrote:
seems to me this is trying to test whether there's a defined value in
$!.
Testing truth falls back to definedness, yes.
however, you've jumped straight into blaming parrot's Exception
PMC, without considering the expected perl 6 behavior.
Well, I was more blaming the *chan
Allison Randal wrote:
The Exception PMC never had a get_bool vtable function implemented,
but it did previously inherit one from ResizablePMCArray. So, that
test was relying on an implementation artifact.
OK, then that was certainly a wart, agreed.
Under what circumstances should an exceptio
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rakudo is currently failing t\spec\S12-class\attributes.t. This turns out
> not to be an issue with attributes, but rather exceptions. The test does:
>
> my $c = Counter.new();
> try {
> $c.x
> }
> ok($!, 'n
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Hi,
Rakudo is currently failing t\spec\S12-class\attributes.t. This turns
out not to be an issue with attributes, but rather exceptions. The test
does:
my $c = Counter.new();
try {
$c.x
}
ok($!, 'no public accessor for private attribute');
And fails because th
Hi,
Rakudo is currently failing t\spec\S12-class\attributes.t. This turns
out not to be an issue with attributes, but rather exceptions. The test
does:
my $c = Counter.new();
try {
$c.x
}
ok($!, 'no public accessor for private attribute');
And fails because the Exception PMC does not impl
