Re: [perl #58934] [CAGE] 'make fulltest' says "PASS" at the end, although some tests failed

2008-09-16 Thread jerry gay
play.html?id=58934 > > > > 'make fulltest' runs several chunks of tests, and does not show a final > summary. So although some tests in some chunks fail, the last thing that > the tester sees is something along these lines: > > ===( 35 > )=

[perl #58934] [CAGE] 'make fulltest' says "PASS" at the end, although some tests failed

2008-09-16 Thread via RT
l summary. So although some tests in some chunks fail, the last thing that the tester sees is something along these lines: ===( 35 )==All tests successful. Files=10, Tests=108, 29 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.02 sys + 19.55 cusr 1.44 csy

Fwd: C++ build succeeded, but with some tests failed

2008-04-14 Thread Senaka Fernando
__cplusplus define missing 3. or due to inline/readline 4. or may be my tweaks Regards, Senaka On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > >

Re: C++ build succeeded, but with some tests failed

2008-04-14 Thread Will Coleda
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > C++ build succeeded, but with some tests failed. There were two issues that > I couldn't formally sorted, and thus I had to tweak it. I have opened > tickets for all other build r

PGE update fails some tests under x86_64

2006-03-17 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 07:08:55PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > I've just applied a change (r11921) to PGE that allows > embedded closures in rules to designate a "return value" for > a match (recently added to S05). > [...] I neglected to mention in my previous post that this update seems t

[perl #29836] [PATCH] No need to skip some tests on Cygwin

2005-08-08 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT
> All extend and thread tests have passed for me on trunk with normal > build. timer seems to pass outside the harness, but isn't happy inside > it. Signal seems to have a 'Signal 1' message in the output which breaks > the test. > > I'm just going to repeat this to double check things. I'll a

Re: [perl #29836] [PATCH] No need to skip some tests on Cygwin

2005-08-07 Thread Nick Glencross
Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote: Hi, I have applied a couple of old patches from Limbic~Region. These patches are enabling some tests for cygwin. Unfortunately I have no cygwin installed, so I can't tell whether the enabled tests are passing. But I think that right after a release is a

[perl #29836] [PATCH] No need to skip some tests on Cygwin

2005-08-07 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT
Hi, I have applied a couple of old patches from Limbic~Region. These patches are enabling some tests for cygwin. Unfortunately I have no cygwin installed, so I can't tell whether the enabled tests are passing. But I think that right after a release is a good time for breaking things. Coul

Re: [perl #36385] Some Tests Failing on Win32 for 8443 revision

2005-06-26 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Craig (via RT) wrote: Downloaded revision 8443 of Parrot to Windows XP Pro using SVN. When using 'nmake' 7.10.3077, some of the test are failing. According to the gettingstarted.pod, none of the tests should fail. README.win32 is more specific - dynclasses are currently broken. Thanks, Crai

[perl #36385] Some Tests Failing on Win32 for 8443 revision

2005-06-25 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Craig # Please include the string: [perl #36385] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36385 > Downloaded revision 8443 of Parrot to Windows XP Pro using SVN. When using 'nmake' 7.10.3077,

[perl #29836] [PATCH] No need to skip some tests on Cygwin

2004-05-24 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Gatcomb # Please include the string: [perl #29836] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=29836 > extend 12 previously hung on Cygwin: If configured with --intval=long and --opcode

[COMMIT] Re-enabled some tests.

2002-06-06 Thread Jeff
Some tests were disabled because of recently-patched problems in the assembler. I'm contemplating simply removing the tests that require exceptions, because we're going to do much more with exceptions than these (probably already deprecated) tests cover. -- Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Some tests

2001-09-18 Thread Simon Cozens
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:14:39PM -0700, Damien Neil wrote: > The attached file contains tests for all Parrot integer ops. > >- Damien THANK YOU! (Applied) -- Calm down, it's *only* ones and zeroes.

Some tests

2001-09-18 Thread Damien Neil
The attached file contains tests for all Parrot integer ops. - Damien #! perl -w use Parrot::Test tests => 26; output_is(<