>At 03:01 PM 12/3/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>Pete Lomax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The following demonstrates that $I1 and .local int i map to the same
>> > register in the output pasm code:
>>
>>Yep. The problem seems to be the backward branch. When you put the
>>"test" sub after th
At 03:01 PM 12/3/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Pete Lomax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following demonstrates that $I1 and .local int i map to the same
> register in the output pasm code:
Yep. The problem seems to be the backward branch. When you put the
"test" sub after the "end" op, its
Pete Lomax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following demonstrates that $I1 and .local int i map to the same
> register in the output pasm code:
Yep. The problem seems to be the backward branch. When you put the
"test" sub after the "end" op, its working fine.
leo
The following demonstrates that $I1 and .local int i map to the same
register in the output pasm code:
.sub _main
goto L1
test:
$I1 = 1
ret
L1:
.local int i
i = 2
call test
print i # prints 1, not 2
end
.end
parrot -o - t.imc shows:
