# New Ticket Created by TOGoS
# Please include the string: [perl #29488]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=29488
OK, this is my first patch EVAR, so feel free to chew
me out if I totally screwed it up
At 12:40 PM -0700 5/10/04, TOGoS (via RT) wrote:
This patch adds some more questions (which I,
personally, would like to know the answers to but
don't) to docs/compiler_faq.pod. It also puts them in
nice categories. Well, I think they're nice...
Looks good--applied, thanks. Now I've more work cut
At 1:02 PM -0700 5/10/04, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... As such I've started a FAQ in
docs/compiler_faq.pod.
When I read that file name, I though about gcc, Win32 compilers usable
for Parrot. Could be misleading ...
Index:
Since we've really started to get folks going writing compilers for
parrot (Woohoo! :) we're running into the perrenial question How the
*heck* do I do X with some regularity.
Getting these questions answered makes life a *lot* easier when
writing compilers, so we should. As such I've started
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... As such I've started a FAQ in
docs/compiler_faq.pod.
When I read that file name, I though about gcc, Win32 compilers usable
for Parrot. Could be misleading ...
leo
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... As such I've started a FAQ in
docs/compiler_faq.pod.
When I read that file name, I though about gcc, Win32 compilers usable
for Parrot. Could be misleading ...
Index: docs/compiler_faq.pod
