At 9:42 AM +0200 7/11/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Simon Glover wrote:
The PMC version of this op (ie cmod_p_p_p) is identical in
implementation to the plain mod op (mod_p_p_p), which seems rather
pointless. Would anybody object if we just got rid of it?
There should probably be a Ccmodulus
Simon Glover wrote:
The PMC version of this op (ie cmod_p_p_p) is identical in
implementation to the plain mod op (mod_p_p_p), which seems rather
pointless. Would anybody object if we just got rid of it?
There should probably be a Ccmodulus vtable meth too which does, what
the current does.
The PMC version of this op (ie cmod_p_p_p) is identical in
implementation to the plain mod op (mod_p_p_p), which seems rather
pointless. Would anybody object if we just got rid of it?
Simon
Simon --
It used to be that the 'mod' op was the mathematically correct
(in the Knuth sense) op, and the 'cmod' op was 'mod' per the C
implementation used to compile Parrot (which are two very different
things, it turns out). I wrote the Knuth-mod op originally, and
proposed having both versions
