Re: switch-based interpreter

2001-09-23 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 08:57 PM 9/22/2001 -0400, Michael Maraist wrote: > I don't remember if this has already been experimented with; I've >lost track of what the previous sets of benchmarks were for. I was >curious to see how much faster a single-function switch based interpret

switch-based interpreter

2001-09-22 Thread Michael Maraist
I don't remember if this has already been experimented with; I've lost track of what the previous sets of benchmarks were for. I was curious to see how much faster a single-function switch based interpreter would go. I took process_opfunc.pl and created process_opfunc_switc