At 06:19 PM 10/5/00 +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
>On 2 Oct 2000, at 16:14, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > At 04:34 PM 9/29/00 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> > >Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've no experience with UML, though. Got a pointer to a quick overview?
> > >
> > >Without a doubt, "UML Distil
At 07:51 PM 10/5/00 +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
>On 5 Oct 2000, at 13:44, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > At 06:19 PM 10/5/00 +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> > >On 2 Oct 2000, at 16:14, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'll have to go pick that up on Thursday and add it to the Darned
> Big Pile
> > > >
On 2 Oct 2000, at 16:14, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 04:34 PM 9/29/00 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> >Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > >
> > > I've no experience with UML, though. Got a pointer to a quick overview?
> >
> >Without a doubt, "UML Distilled" is the bible of the genre.
>
> I'll have to go pick that
On 5 Oct 2000, at 13:44, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 06:19 PM 10/5/00 +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> >On 2 Oct 2000, at 16:14, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> > > I'll have to go pick that up on Thursday and add it to the Darned Big Pile
> > > of books I need to read.
> >
> >Funny how everyone seems to hav
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> For the internals, though...
DS> This would be very useful, and it's a feature I'd really like to implement.
DS> Basically you're asking for pre-computed, indirect, shared hash keys. This
DS> sounds like a Good Plan to me.
Why precomp
> "PRL" == Perl6 RFC Librarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PRL> =item 2. Empty trailing fields are currently suppressed (although a
PRL> -1 as the third argument disables this). I suggest that empty trailing
PRL> fields be retained by default.
Extremely useful, I rely on this. It makes non-
