Re: How?

Leo (Michael, and Dmitry), Thanks, I am also interested in contributing and I'll put your suggestions to good use! -- George Plumfield > Dmitry Nikolayev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello > > How can I be involved in the project? Maybe, some help is needed? > > What would you like to cont

Re: [perl #24371] [PATCH] Unescaped metachars in output_like tests

Adam Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A few tests using output_like and friends have unescaped '.' chars. Thanks, applied. leo

Re: [perl #24376] [PATCH] NetBSD

Nick Kostirya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With this patch Parrot is being successfully built on NetBSD 1.6. > > All tests successful, 27 subtests skipped. Just curious: is "make testexec" successful? Anyway applied, thanks, [ BTW please send diffs relative to parrot root or one dir below,

Re: [perl #24378] [PATCH] fix warnings in cpu_deps.c on Solaris

David Robins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "src/cpu_dep.c", line 36: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of > The patch changes the type that stores the instruction from int to unsigned > int. Thanks, applied, leo

Character classification functions

The current chartype struct contains an is_digit function. Do we want to add is_alpha, is_space, etc., or will a single is_ctype function, with an enum parameter, suffice? A single function would simplify the addition of new character classes, but at a (small?) cost in speed. It would also keep th

[CVS ci] use pointer vtables for passing Sub address

I've remove the rather hackish set_integer_native() and get_integer() methods for Sub-like PMCs. The old sequence: set_addr I0, _label set P0, I0 is now just set_addr P0, _label This might break some languages using such constructs. Also obtaining the address of a Sub-like PMC is changed

Re: Character classification functions

On 1 Nov 2003, at 16:37, Peter Gibbs wrote: The current chartype struct contains an is_digit function. Do we want to add is_alpha, is_space, etc., or will a single is_ctype function, with an enum parameter, suffice? Excuse me for being naming fusspot for a second. What Parrot calls a chartype

Re: Character classification functions

Peter Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I prefer the single function approach, so that is what I will start > implementing if there are no timeous objections. Yep, a single is_ctype() should really be enough. > Regards > Peter Gibbs leo

Re: Character classification functions

"Michael Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since the enum will specify what you yourself call character classes > can't we call the function is_charclass() instead? The isascii etc macros have been defined in a header called ctype.h for some time, and glibc actually has a macro 'isctype' whic