Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> set layout['member'], .DATATYPE_INT
> push layout, 0
> push layout, 0
Pushing zero as offset should do The Right Thing, that is proper
aligning the item. Tighter packed structures can be achieved with
explicit offset parameters.
Its basical
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the following code trips up IMCC's temp lifetime tracing:
Fix committed.
leo
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:27:31PM +, Harry Jackson wrote:
> Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> >*) I'll try and patch up the docs, and I'll concentrate on the PDDs, but
> >any help on them is greatly appreciated. *Especially* IMCC docs.
>
> Do we need an NCI section in the IMCC.faq. If the vote is ye
# New Ticket Created by Matt Fowles
# Please include the string: [perl #25960]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=25960 >
All~
This patch make the problem case submitted by Jeff Clites work. All
tests pass
Hi,
I would like to add Parrot as a scripting engine for a software project.
Embedding it is no problem, but I was wondering if the current
implementation supports the embedder to provide functions to the Parrot
bytecode applications? The idea is that I would like to access C
functions the embedde
Joseph Ryan writes:
> >It's surely possible by modifying that class's DISPATCH.
> >
> >Whether it should actually be in the language is up for debate. I'd say
> >that if you need to do this with any frequency whatsoever, you're not
> >thinking about roles right. A good example might be in order
Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch make the problem case submitted by Jeff Clites work. All
> tests pass, and his sample has been added to the tests.
> struct RegisterChunkBuf* top = stack->top;
> if (top->used > 1) {
> +top->used--;
Thanks for the patch *but*
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, here's a quick scoop and status.
> *) I'd like to shoot for a Feb 14th release. Names wanted. (I'm
> partial to the bleeding heart release, but not that partial)
I had planned towards Feb 29th. A nice dated too this year.
> *) Namespaces are going
Leopold Toetsch writes:
> I'd add some syntax additions and some notes:
>
> - Pn above is a NameSpace PMC, derived from Hash
> - an interpreter has a current namespace
> - located in the context, so that its restored after sub calls
>
>getinterp P2
>find_global Pn, P2["."] # get current
Hey,
The following PIR crashes CVS head:
.sub _main
$P0 = new PerlUndef
.sym PerlUndef i
i = new PerlUndef
i = 0
L0:
$I0 = 0
$P1 = new PerlUndef
$P1 = 10
unless i < $P1 goto L3
$I0 = 1
L3:
if $I0 goto L1
goto
On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error
> 1 years
>
> Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
How recently did you check? I committed a reimplementation of perl6
regexes abou
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:30:44AM -0500, Joseph Ryan wrote:
> >Whether it should actually be in the language is up for debate. I'd say
> >that if you need to do this with any frequency whatsoever, you're not
> >thinking about roles right. A good example might be in order... :-)
>
> Well, what i
Sterling Hughes writes:
> Hey,
>
> The following PIR crashes CVS head:
>
> .sub _main
> $P0 = new PerlUndef
> .sym PerlUndef i
> i = new PerlUndef
> i = 0
> L0:
> $I0 = 0
> $P1 = new PerlUndef
> $P1 = 10
> unless i < $P1 goto L3
>
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 00:52, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Pushing zero as offset should do The Right Thing, that is proper
> aligning the item. Tighter packed structures can be achieved with
> explicit offset parameters.
In this case, it doesn't, as the struct I'm emulating is:
typedef struc
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error
> >1 years
> >
> > Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
>
> How recently did you check? I
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In this case, it doesn't, as the struct I'm emulating is:
> typedef struct {
> Uint8 type; /* SDL_KEYDOWN or SDL_KEYUP */
> Uint8 which;/* The keyboard device index */
> Uint8 state;/* SDL_PRESSED or SD
This ...
.include "errors.pasm"
errorsoff .PARROT_ERRORS_GLOBALS_FLAG
find_global P1, "no_such_global"
defined I0, P1
... allows working around current exception handler (COW) bug and is
more perlish then the default pie-thonish behavior, which is: just throw
an exception
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 13:36, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > As I understand it (and correct me if I'm wrong), SDL_keysym needs a
> > byte of padding on my architecture within SDL_KeyboardEvent.
> Brr. I don't know. I've to ask my debugger for that :) If you have
> SDL_keysym alone, that needs 3 bytes
> "c" == chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
c> I ran this program in lieu of the debugger:
i recall an old trick i learned to get offsets into structs which would
be easier to read than hex addresses:
c> int main ()
c> {
c> SDL_KeyboardEvent kbevent;
c> printf( "0x%08X
Andrew Dougherty wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote:
On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error 1 years
Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
How recentl
I've added the Perl modules for the docs tools to lib/Parrot/IO and
lib/Parrot/Docs. I've also added Pod-Simple (2.05) and Pod-Escapes
(1.03) which they use.
Running
perl tools/docs/write_docs.pl
should build the html tree in docs/html. I'd be interested to know of
any problems encountered.
> I've added the Perl modules for the docs tools to lib/Parrot/IO and
> lib/Parrot/Docs. I've also added Pod-Simple (2.05) and Pod-Escapes
> (1.03) which they use.
I probably blinked.. but why are we including CPAN modules that we are
not likely to change into the parrot repository?
-R
22 matches
Mail list logo
