Just to let everyone know, if there aren't any comments on the scheme
in PDD 15, I'm going to implement it as-is and be done with it, at
least for now. This would be a good time to speak up--can't guarantee
that I'll put the changes in for this rev, but I certainly can't
think about it if I don
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Just to let everyone know, if there aren't any comments on the scheme
> in PDD 15, I'm going to implement it as-is and be done with it, at
> least for now. This would be a good time to speak up--can't guarantee
> that I'll put the changes in for this rev,
Hopefully in time to make the feature freeze, here's an effort at solving this
problem. I went through the platform .c and .h files and broke out the redundant bits
into the following "modules", which were already delimited by comments in generic.*:
dl: dynamic library loading
e
One really pedantic comment: wouldn't it make sense to rename the
fetchmethod op to fetchmeth, for consistency with callmeth, tailcallmeth
etc?
Simon
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:21, Jens Rieks wrote:
> This patch fixes _SDL_WaitEvent a bit; SDL_WaitEvent returns an integer and
> not a SDL_Event.
> It also introduces _SDL_PollEvent which is mostly a copy of _SDL_WaitEvent.
> Finally, _SDL_loop is modified to allow an "idle" event entry that gets c
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:57, Jens Rieks wrote:
> here is an easy to use (with PIR code) wrapper of the SDL library.
> It tries to hide all internals of the wrapper and makes the most important
> SDL functions directly available in PIR code.
Overall this looks good. I am not sure if it is better
