Re: register allocation

2004-08-08 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The code, when I try with -v, gives: > debug = 0x0 > Reading forms/order.imc > using optimization '0' (0) > Starting parse... > warning:imcc:build_reglist: probably too small HASH_SIZE (29451 symbols) > error:imcc:make_life_range: Out of mem c

Re: parrot cvs mirrored with svk

2004-08-08 Thread Chia-liang Kao
Providing the mirror is not an attempt to force or encourage a switch of the system being used. It's just the case that with svk and the mirror: * It'd be easier for me to follow the development. * I could make offline branches if I start hacking parrot. * Vendor branches could be maintained mor

[perl #30986] make test failed on i386-freebsd52

2004-08-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Chia-liang Kao # Please include the string: [perl #30986] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30986 > latest parrot trunk as of today. FreeBSD portege.clkao.org 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2

Re: [perl #30986] make test failed on i386-freebsd52

2004-08-08 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 11:01:46AM -0700, Chia-liang Kao wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Chia-liang Kao > # Please include the string: [perl #30986] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30986 > > > > lates

Re: register allocation

2004-08-08 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can verify this step by running -v: $ parrot -v inv_mod.imc 2>&1 | grep symb build_reglist: 5783 symbols allocate_non_interfering, now: 2205 symbols It really should help. leo

Re: An alternate call scheme

2004-08-08 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, I've looked over Leo's proposal. I'm not comfortable with some > of what it does, so I think it's no-go, ... What does it make a "no-go"? > 1) The interpreter pointer gets another level of indirection, it > points to a pointer to the interpreter. (W

[perl #30993] [PATCH] get_bool() for Float PMC

2004-08-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer # Please include the string: [perl #30993] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30993 > The Float PMC is checking for thruth with the default implemation of get_bool

[perl #30995] [PATCH] NCI for non-x86 platforms

2004-08-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #30995] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30995 > Anyone who thinks sizeof(int) == sizeof(long) == sizeof(*) should now as a penan

[perl #30996] [PATCH] trace prettyprinting

2004-08-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #30996] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30996 > I added more decoding of the arguments for parrot -t, and added a little bit of

[perl #30997] pdb labels broken in tru64/alpha

2004-08-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #30997] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30997 > The PDB labels are somehow b0rked in tru64/alpha: (make pdb) kosh:/tmp/jhi/par

Re: [perl #30986] make test failed on i386-freebsd52

2004-08-08 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do the number of GC runs (which think that this is testing) depend on the > amount of RAM or swap on the machine? The tests print differences of before/after e.g. a sweep opcode. > Nicholas Clark leo

Re: [perl #30995] [PATCH] NCI for non-x86 platforms

2004-08-08 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:46:20AM -0700, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi > # Please include the string: [perl #30995] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30995 > > > >

Re: [perl #30995] [PATCH] NCI for non-x86 platforms

2004-08-08 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:01:52PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:46:20AM -0700, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi > > # Please include the string: [perl #30995] > > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issu

Re: [perl #30995] [PATCH] NCI for non-x86 platforms

2004-08-08 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:18:01PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:01:52PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:46:20AM -0700, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > > # New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi > > > # Please include the string: [perl #30995

[perl #31000] [PATCH] to go on top of perl #30995

2004-08-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #31000] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31000 > To accommodate even more sizeof() combinations and to avoid duplicate cases in t

Re: register allocation

2004-08-08 Thread Melvin Smith
At 10:54 AM 8/7/2004 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 12:45 PM +0200 8/7/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Sean O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Leopold Toetsch) writes: The interference_graph size is n_symbols * n_symbols * sizeof(a_pointer). This might already be too much. 2) Ther