Henrik Gulbrandsen wrote:
Hackers and Gentlemen - I bring you a preliminary Parrot Syntax Engine!
That's a really interesting stuff. I can imagine that it'll be really
useful for Parrot and that it could become more or less integrated.
Some unsorted questions and remarks:
- How fast is DParser co
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See: http://xrl.us/emnk
=> dynclasses/pydic.pmc
> Except for fromkeys, get_string, and __new__, the logic is not Python
> specific, and could easily be refactored into a common base class for
> others to use.
Yep. The problem is that all current usage of ha
> the library 'libnci.so' is used for testing the Native Call Interface, not
> for implementing NCI. So the name 'libnci_test.so' make more sense.
>
> For Win32 I have moved 'libnci.def' for
> 'runtime/parrot/dynext/libnci_test.def'. However
> I could not test wether this works.
I've just noticed
Hi all,
I've been reading the internals list for a while more
or less regularly and as this is me first post, it is
about time, that I introduce myself:
My name is Sven Schubert, I am studying information
systems and business in Germany and currently I'm on
an exchange program (ERASMUS for fellow
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 11:10, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> - How fast is DParser compared to bison/flex?
> - What about memory usage compared to bison/flex?
I will leave those questions for John, but a first guess would be that
they are a bit too general to be meaningful. One would expect DParser to
be
