Re: Namespaces

2005-03-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since PIR behaviour is ours to define, it can do whatever we want. > I'm inclined to rule that a plain > bar() > is equivalent to: > current_namespace::bar() > and as such the PIR compiler should look up the function by name in > the current na

Re: [CVS ci] builtins

2005-03-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 5:19 PM +0100 3/19/05, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >>1) builtin methods are living in a class namespace e.g. >> >> Float."cos" >> ParrotIO."open" # unimplemented > I'm way out of the loop and may have been dealt with in prior mail, > but are we doing re

Re: [perl #34501] Segfault in stress test

2005-03-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been checking that my md5sum library still works after a few > months, I've now checked in the whole MD5 stuff, slightly modifed (whitespace, cosmetics, converted to a library, fix error with files > 2MB) and a bit faster (25 times for bigger files

[perl #34527] [PATCH] t/pmc/pmc.t - tests excluded

2005-03-22 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34527] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34527 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored ou

[perl #34528] [PATCH] t/pmc/pmc.t - tests excluded

2005-03-22 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34528] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34528 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored out

[perl #34529] [PATCH] t/pmc/perlint.t - excluded tests of t/pmc/pmc.t included

2005-03-22 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34529] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34529 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored out

[perl #34530] [PATCH] t/pmc/perlnum.t - excluded tests of t/pmc/pmc.t included

2005-03-22 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34530] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34530 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored out

[perl #34531] [PATCH] t/pmc/perlstring.t - exluded tests of t/pmc/pmc.t included

2005-03-22 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steven Schubiger # Please include the string: [perl #34531] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34531 > > The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. > These should be factored out

Re: Passing on the hat

2005-03-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ ...] , it's time to pass on the responsibility to someone > who actually has the time. (Though I'll be wading through some of the > recent backlog anyway, since I can't help but meddle :) Many thanks for all your time and patience. It'll be great if you

Re: [perl #34531] [PATCH] t/pmc/perlstring.t - exluded tests of t/pmc/pmc.t included

2005-03-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Steven Schubiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The test file t/pmc/pmc.t is full of Perl* tests. >> These should be factored out into t/pmc/perl*.t. [ patches ] #34527 ignored #34528 - #34531 applied, thanks. Some more todo ;) Thanks, leo $ perl -Ilib t/pmc/pmc.t 1..51 ok 1 - newpmc ok 2 - il

Re: [perl #34501] Segfault in stress test

2005-03-22 Thread Nick Glencross
Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote: Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been checking that my md5sum library still works after a few months, I've now checked in the whole MD5 stuff, slightly modifed (whitespace, cosmetics, converted to a library, fix error with files > 2MB) and a bit f

Another Perl Task: review PMC compiler

2005-03-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Investigating some recent dynclass/py*.t I found another problem in the PMC compiler (classes/pmc2c2.pl, lib/Parrot/Pmc2c.pm). On one computer I have in dynclasses/pylong.c temp_base_vtable Parrot_default_destroy, on the second I got: Parrot_BigInt_destroy, The latter is cor

md5 (was: [perl #34501] Segfault in stress test)

2005-03-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My hero. Thanks! Welcome. > Has anyone had a chance to try it on 64 bit, or swapped > endian? This is a PPC: $ ./parrot examples/assembly/md5sum.imc MANIFEST This appears to be a big endian processor: Please verify the MD5 checksum b3ff04e9aa28c79baa

Re: Passing on the hat

2005-03-22 Thread MrJoltCola
At 06:55 PM 3/21/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote: According to Dan Sugalski: > As such, I'd like to say a big thanks to Chip Salzenburg who's agreed > to take the hat. I thank you for your kind words, and for giving me the opportunity again to work long hours and explain difficult and arbitrary design

Re: Passing on the hat

2005-03-22 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:27 PM -0500 3/22/05, MrJoltCola wrote: At 06:55 PM 3/21/2005, Chip Salzenberg wrote: According to Dan Sugalski: As such, I'd like to say a big thanks to Chip Salzenburg who's agreed to take the hat. I thank you for your kind words, and for giving me the opportunity again to work long hours

Fearless leadership...

2005-03-22 Thread Chip Salzenberg
It seems to me that the most productive things to worry about, from a design point of view, are the things that interest the hubristic and/or impatient people. Therefore, in the spirit of the Hindmost: If you're out ahead of me, who are you and what are you doing? -- Chip Salzenberg-

Re: Fearless leadership...

2005-03-22 Thread Chip Salzenberg
According to Chip Salzenberg: > Therefore, in the spirit of the Hindmost: If you're out ahead of me, > who are you and what are you doing? It's been suggested to me on IRC that my previous message was a bit opaque. Let me try again: What design issues are crying for attention right now? I know

[perl #34548] [TODO] Replace classes/pmc2c.pl with classes/pmc2c2.pl

2005-03-22 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse # Please include the string: [perl #34548] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34548 > pmc2c2.pl is the new pmc2c.pl. Both currently exist in Parrot CVS. Either pmc2c.pl s

[perl #34548] [TODO] Replace classes/pmc2c.pl with classes/pmc2c2.pl

2005-03-22 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT
> [mdiep - Di 22. MÃr 2005, 14:35:02]: > > pmc2c2.pl is the new pmc2c.pl. Both currently exist in Parrot CVS. > Either pmc2c.pl should be deleted or pmc2c2.pl should be renamed to > pmc2c.pl. A better location might be 'build_tools/pmc2c.pl*, as the script is also used in 'dynclasses/build.pl'.

Perl 6 Summary for 2005-03-07 through 2005-03-22

2005-03-22 Thread Matt Fowles
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-03-07 through 2005-03-22 All~ Welcome to yet another fortnights summary. I believe this is the highest volume I have ever seen the three lists at simultaneously. Hopefully they will keep it up, because good work is being done. To aid in the epic endeavou

Re: [perl #34483] [PATCH] Doc : Build with MinGW

2005-03-22 Thread Matt Diephouse
via RT François PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by François PERRAD > # Please include the string: [perl #34483] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34483 > > > Following patch on mswin