On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 03:02:29PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> it apparently can get more confusing. I don't think we sorted out all the
> possibilities, but Nick C. was the last one fiddling with it.
I didn't actually try to work out all the possibilities. I managed to avoid
the problem by
Please
how can I call C++ from Perl in code? I can not find how to
complete same dll library or some like this. thanks Tomas
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 13:38, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Wenn du das noch vor deiner Abreise liest:
>
> Autrijus wusste gerne in etwas, was du in deinem Vortrag an Perl6 zeigen
> wirst, damit es nicht allzuviel Ueberschneidungen mit seinem Vortrag gibt.
>
> Slides o.ae. wuerden ihn interes
Following google SoC and TODO item,
https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Ticket/Display.html?id=33922, here is the
scheme proposal for a new parrot GC (many thanks to leo for his help).
=
In order to allow more powerful GC schemes, we need to be
Woops, sorry.
This mail was not meant to be send to the list.
jens
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 15:21, Jens Rieks wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2005 13:38, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Wenn du das noch vor deiner Abreise liest:
> >
> > Autrijus wusste gerne in etwas, was du in deinem Vortra
i'm no gc expert, but here's my comments after discussions with
alexandre on #parrot.
On 6/8/05, Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Following google SoC and TODO item,
> https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Ticket/Display.html?id=33922, here is the
> scheme proposal for a new parrot GC (many thanks
"tuned dynamically", as in at run-time? alexandre mentioned this may
be possible on #parrot, but there may be trouble with decreasing the
generation count. i don't know if run-time tuning of the generation
count is necessary, but if so, i imagine that decreasing the count at
run-time could be ac
jerry gay wrote:
i'm no gc expert, but here's my comments after discussions with
alexandre on #parrot.
On 6/8/05, Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
since threading issues haven't been mentioned here, i thought i'd make
sure they get discussed. now, if someone could say something
int
Making some modifications to the tcl PIR, I just got the following error:
(cd ../../ && ./parrot --output=languages/tcl/lib/tcllib.pbc
languages/tcl/lib/tcllib.imc)
make: *** [lib/tcllib.pbc] Error 138
running through gdb, I see:
(gdb) run languages/tcl/lib/tcllib.imc
Starting program: /Users/
Maybe someone can "translate" this:
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/651433.html
to parrot's usage (and troubles) of continuations.
leo
William Coleda wrote:
Making some modifications to the tcl PIR, I just got the following error:
The recent change (r8292) WRT freeze/thaw might have impacts on existing
PBCs.
To be sure please "make realclean" and rm existing .pbc.
Thanks,
leo
Summary: An ordered hash that does not support deletes could cause a
user visible bug. At a minimum it should support the special case of
delete that is supported by the Perl each() operator.
Details: This Week in Perl 6, May 25, 2005-May 31, 2005
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2005/06/p6pdigest/20050
Tolkin, Steve wrote:
Summary: An ordered hash that does not support deletes could cause a
user visible bug. At a minimum it should support the special case of
delete that is supported by the Perl each() operator.
The proposed ordered hash ist mostly used for Parrot internals. If a
user visibl
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
So we add a level of indirection: objects consist of a header and the
actual data. Headers are allocated once and for all at object creation
and do not move. [...]
The big disadvantage of this approach is that we use one or two words
(if objects need to know where their he
Sam Vilain wrote:
AIUI, another effect of adding another indirection to every pointer lookup,
is that it will place a little extra stress on the memory caching systems,
as two regions will need to be accessed continually.
Yes, that's of course true. But please compare:
now
The Perl 6 summary for the week ending 2005-06-07
Crumbs. I've remembered to write the summary this week. Now if I can
just remember to bill O'Reilly for, err, 2003's summaries. Heck, it's
not like waiting for the dollar to get stronger has paid off.
Ah well, no use crying over spi
16 matches
Mail list logo
