I submitted a smoke test, but I think the graphics doesn't show enough
information, so, here is the output of make smoke, on Darwin, Tiger.
perl t/harness --html
# Failed test (t/pmc/nci.t at line 35)
# got: 'parrot(23511,0xa000ef98) malloc: *** Deallocation of a
pointer not mall
# New Ticket Created by Roger Browne
# Please include the string: [perl #37386]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37386 >
In file include/parrot/cclass.h, the values of enum_cclass_any and
enum_cclass_none app
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #37388]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37388 >
From Configure.pl :
=item C<--expnetwork>
Enable experimental networking. This is an
Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
[leo - Mon Jun 13 00:47:57 2005]:
perldoc -ud packfile-c.pod ../src/packfile.c
Unknow option -d
Leo,
What's the purpose of this bug?
Well, obviously does my perldoc, which seems to be from 5.8.0, not
understand the -d option.
-J
leo
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Will Coleda (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: [perl #37388] [TODO] remove -expnetwork from Config
> From Configure.pl :
>
> =item C<--expnetwork>
>
> Enable experimental networking. This is an unused option and should
> prob
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 14:44:48 +0100, Alberto Simes wrote:
> I submitted a smoke test, but I think the graphics doesn't show enough
> information, so, here is the output of make smoke, on Darwin, Tiger.
Odd, I wonder why diagnosis are emitted on STDERR (or something else
maybe).
If they would
Eliza is now working again (at least partially. btw: the debug output
below is part of sample/eliza2.bas)
$ perl compile.pl samples/eliza2.bas && ../../../parrot TARG_test.imc
Please wait, initializing...(This will take a minute)
I am Eliza, the Computer Psychiatrist
Why have you requested thi
Last status of this error:
> --
> $ perl compile.pl test.bas Use of uninitialized value in concatenation
> (.) or string at compile.pl line 22, line 10.
> At BASIC source line :
> at source line 0 at COMP_toker.pm line 208,
> line 10.
This now counts up to 100 and complains at the end
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 03:59:40AM -0700, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
> Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> >>[leo - Mon Jun 13 00:47:57 2005]:
> >>
> >>perldoc -ud packfile-c.pod ../src/packfile.c
> >>Unknow option -d
>
> > Leo,
> >
> > What's the purpose of this bug?
>
> Well, obviously does my p
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:16:58PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What is the status of this bug? Should this be a PGE todo item?
My opinion is that it's "not a bug" -- the normal behavior for
most programs with infinite recursive loops is that they
eventually explode. The orig
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 12:41:18PM -0700, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:16:58PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > What is the status of this bug? Should this be a PGE todo item?
>
> My opinion is that it's "not a bug" -- the normal behavior for
If I change the log file for the warnings, all the tests pass. We just
need to know if the malloc library is correct about these warnings.
Cheers
Alberto
Yuval Kogman wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 14:44:48 +0100, Alberto Simes wrote:
I submitted a smoke test, but I think the graphics doesn't
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 17:25 +0200, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> Odd, I wonder why diagnosis are emitted on STDERR (or something else
> maybe).
That's where Test::Builder emits them. Test::Harness never collected
them or parsed them until recently.
It's fairly difficult to decide whether a diagnostic i
[cut from a off list thread between jhoblitt & nickg]
>As a general comment, 36119 makes me a little nervous as 'chmod' isn't
>something you can count on unless your on a POSIX like system and osname
>ne 'MSWin32' certainly would encompass non-POSIX systems. Are you
>planning on retool this patch
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 06:24:30PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> Nothing uses it yet; it's just there to test against in whatever
> generates the file for embedders. Someone'll have to enable it
> manually with some Makefile magic.
Would you like to propose such magic, at least a model?
("It's only
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 07:55:02PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 09:55:44AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> > > > What is the status of this bug? Should this be a PGE todo item?
> > >
> > > My opinion is that it's "not a bug" -- the normal behavior for
> > > most progr
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 01:31:54PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> [cut from a off list thread between jhoblitt & nickg]
>
> >As a general comment, 36119 makes me a little nervous as 'chmod' isn't
> >something you can count on unless your on a POSIX like system and osname
> >ne 'MSWin32' cer
Joshua~
On 10/9/05, Joshua Hoblitt via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 03 12:49:55 2005]:
> >
> > I brought it up on the list first, and Dan was OK with it because
> > scons can output a series of commands (like a bat file or batch
> > script) to build from scratch (n
18 matches
Mail list logo
