On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 at 07:31 -0800, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT...:
From: Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:31:10 -0800
Subject: [perl #37906] socklen_t not defined
Hi David,
why does parrot expect socklen_t to be defined?
Since
Hi list,
Yesterday I did a quick fib(30) benchmark comparing Parrot Win32 daily
build (using jit core) and NekoVM (http://nekovm.org). The results are
showing that Parrot is 5 times slower than Neko (see my blog post on
this point there : http://ncannasse.free.fr/?p=66).
I would like to unde
FYI I saw this once but haven't been able to repeat it:
t/dynoplibs/myopsok 6/7
# Failed test (t/dynoplibs/myops.t at line 107)
# got: '1
# alarm1
# 2
# alarm2
# 3
# alarm3
# alarm1
# alarm3
# alarm3
# 4
# alarm3
# alarm3
# 5
# don
On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:09, Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
Yesterday I did a quick fib(30) benchmark comparing Parrot Win32 daily
build (using jit core) and NekoVM (http://nekovm.org). The results are
showing that Parrot is 5 times slower than Neko (see my blog post on
this point there : http://ncann
I have released "Amber for Parrot" version 0.4.2 (Argument):
Downloads: http://xamber.org/download.html
Release history: http://xamber.org/history.html
Project home page: http://xamber.org/index.html
"Amber for Parrot" is an Eiffel-like scripting language for the Parrot
Virtual Machine.
Changes
On Feb 28, 2006, at 14:59, Tim Bunce wrote:
FYI I saw this once but haven't been able to repeat it:
t/dynoplibs/myopsok 6/7
This can happen if the machine is busy.
leo
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:04:59PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2006, at 18:29, Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> >The runtime dlfunc code will need to be altered to normalize away the
> >trailing v so old code won't break. Should it warn about that?
>
> Yes, a warning please.
Here's the patch.
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 Andy Dougherty wrote:
[svn co on Solaris 8 is painfully *slow*]
> $ time wget http://cvs.perl.org/snapshots/parrot/parrot-latest.tar.gz
>
> real0m16.84s
> user0m0.09s
> sys 0m0.20s
>
> $ time svn co http://svn.perl.org/parrot/trunk parrot-trunk
>
> real 2:0
"Nicolas Cannasse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yesterday I did a quick fib(30) benchmark comparing Parrot Win32 daily
build (using jit core)
I'm guessing that's the build that I'm to blame for, and it's maybe worth
pointing out that it ain't an optimized build. But I think leo supplied the
re
>
> On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:09, Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
>
>> Yesterday I did a quick fib(30) benchmark comparing Parrot Win32 daily
>> build (using jit core) and NekoVM (http://nekovm.org). The results are
>> showing that Parrot is 5 times slower than Neko (see my blog post on
>> this point there
The main flag sets for speed are -C, -Cj, -S, -Sj, -j, and sometimes
adding -Oc as well. On ppc, -C and -Cj are often the fastest. On x86,
-j is most often the fastest. But here's the cavaet, to use JIT, you
of course need someone to port it to that arch. With -C, your compiler
has to suppo
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:37:23PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2006, at 14:59, Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> >FYI I saw this once but haven't been able to repeat it:
> >
> >t/dynoplibs/myopsok 6/7
>
> This can happen if the machine is busy.
Okay. Can't the test be ma
Hi there,
I just managed to get Valgrind working on my Linux PPC box. Are Valgrind
(memcheck, cachegrind, etc) reports useful from various platforms? If so, is
there a good example PIR file to run that stresses sufficient code (or should
someone add a new testgrind target that collects these
Running "make test" in languages/tcl should be pretty painful.
On Feb 28, 2006, at 5:13 PM, chromatic wrote:
Hi there,
I just managed to get Valgrind working on my Linux PPC box. Are
Valgrind
(memcheck, cachegrind, etc) reports useful from various platforms?
If so, is
there a good exampl
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 14:19, Will Coleda wrote:
> Running "make test" in languages/tcl should be pretty painful.
Some tests will fail (STDERR is different), but you can set $ENV{VALGRIND} and
anything that uses Parrot::Test will run it. Nifty.
-- c
On 2/25/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
>
> > fill the function body of Parrot_register_move() (src/utils.c 633 ff).
>
> Parrot is now using this function [1] for recursive tailcalls. There are
> 2 new tests in t/compilers/imcc/imcpasm/optc.t.
>
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
