Re: [PROPOSED PATCH] Add Parrot::Embed to Repository

2006-08-16 Thread jerry gay
On 8/15/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's a proposed patch that seems to work okay for me on Linux. It's not great or beautiful, mostly because of the Makefile hackery. It's a starting point though. I suspect Windows might complain. i'll happily test, but i can't apply it, as i

[svn:parrot-pdd] r14131 - in trunk: . config/auto config/auto/cpu config/auto/cpu/i386 config/auto/cpu/ppc config/auto/cpu/sun4 config/gen/makefiles config/init docs/pdds docs/pdds/clip docs/stm examp

2006-08-16 Thread creiss
Author: creiss Date: Wed Aug 16 08:53:17 2006 New Revision: 14131 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/clip/pdd10_embedding.pod trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod Changes in other areas also in this revision: Added: trunk/config/auto/cpu/ - copied from r14128, /branches/stm/config/auto/cpu/

Re: [PROPOSED PATCH] Add Parrot::Embed to Repository

2006-08-16 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 08:57, jerry gay wrote: > i'll happily test, but i can't apply it, as it seems not to be in the > format my patch util expects. did you use C? i don't see the > familiar "Index: " headers. It's a standard svk diff. That's really weird. Is this any better? -- c --- M

Re: [PROPOSED PATCH] Add Parrot::Embed to Repository

2006-08-16 Thread jerry gay
On 8/16/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 16 August 2006 08:57, jerry gay wrote: > i'll happily test, but i can't apply it, as it seems not to be in the > format my patch util expects. did you use C? i don't see the > familiar "Index: " headers. It's a standard svk diff. Th

Re: [PROPOSED PATCH] Add Parrot::Embed to Repository

2006-08-16 Thread jerry gay
On 8/15/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's a proposed patch that seems to work okay for me on Linux. It's not great or beautiful, mostly because of the Makefile hackery. It's a starting point though. I suspect Windows might complain. windows indeed complains. not only about miss

[svn:parrot-pdd] r14139 - trunk/docs/pdds

2006-08-16 Thread creiss
Author: creiss Date: Wed Aug 16 09:48:09 2006 New Revision: 14139 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod Log: Undo accidental reversion. Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod == --- trunk/docs/pdds/p

[perl #40151] [TODO] Remove set_pmc vtable method

2006-08-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse # Please include the string: [perl #40151] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40151 > So sayeth array.pmc: void set_pmc(PMC *other) Currently, an alias to C. Expec

[perl #40153] [CAGE] TEST_PROG

2006-08-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #40153] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40153 > Anything referring to TEST_PROG should probably be renamed to "parrot" or "executable"

[perl #40156] [TODO] - Can't use an Iterator with a DynLexPad PMC

2006-08-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse # Please include the string: [perl #40156] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40156 > I don't know how to write a test for this off the top of my head, but Iterator and D

[perl #40158] [TODO] - Can't use an Iterator with a DynLexPad PMC

2006-08-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse # Please include the string: [perl #40158] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40158 > I don't know how to write a test for this off the top of my head, but Iterator and D

[perl #40171] [TODO] - Can't use an Iterator with a DynLexPad PMC

2006-08-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse # Please include the string: [perl #40171] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40171 > I don't know how to write a test for this off the top of my head, but Iterator and D

[perl #40178] None Must Die

2006-08-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Chip Salzenberg # Please include the string: [perl #40178] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40178 > The None class serves no useful (portable) purpose and it should be removed, especial

[perl #40179] None Must Die

2006-08-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Chip Salzenberg # Please include the string: [perl #40179] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40179 > The None class serves no useful (portable) purpose and it should be removed, especial

[perl #40182] [TODO] Convert PGE::CodeString to .pmc

2006-08-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #40182] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40182 > <@pmichaud> CodeString is one of those that I think could give a nice perfor