Re: [perl #40278] [CAGE] perl coding standards coda.

Hi Bernhard, thanks for adding the codas in the Perl files. No worries! I actually found some more perl files so will make the necessary changes when I get the tuits. Could you also provide a test in t/codingstd/code_coda.t, so that future Perl files will automatically be checked? Will do :

[perl #40360] [PATCH] implement loadlib(NULL)

# New Ticket Created by Dmitry Karasik # Please include the string: [perl #40360] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40360 > dlopen(NULL,...) on linux returns NULL, and consequently dlsym(NULL,...) can be used t

Re: [perl #40361] [PATCH] #40278 [CAGE] perl coding standards coda. (cont.)

On 9/19/06, via RT Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # New Ticket Created by "Paul Cochrane" # Please include the string: [perl #40361] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40361 > This is a patch of more Pe

Re: [perl #40361] [PATCH] #40278 [CAGE] perl coding standards coda. (cont.)

Jerry, firstly, line endings are unrelated to this effort and should be a separate patch. that's no biggie, and alone wouldn't stop me from applying. I can do that in a separate patch if you want. That's not a major problem, and probably a good idea. I'd not realised some of the issues you b

Re: [perl #40361] [PATCH] #40278 [CAGE] perl coding standards coda. (cont.)

On 9/19/06, Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > firstly, line endings are unrelated to this effort and should be a > separate patch. that's no biggie, and alone wouldn't stop me from > applying. I can do that in a separate patch if you want. That's not a major problem, and probably a good

Re: [perl #40361] [PATCH] #40278 [CAGE] perl coding standards coda. (cont.)

Jerry, oh, and yes, i believe the shebang should be in all perl files... but this isn't specified *yet* in pdd07. if you can enter the ticket, that would be fantastic, and we'll get a ruling from chip. This is going to sound rather silly, but... how does one enter a new ticket to RT? I've got

Re: [perl #40361] [PATCH] #40278 [CAGE] perl coding standards coda. (cont.)

On 9/19/06, Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is going to sound rather silly, but... how does one enter a new ticket to RT? I've got an account, but can't see anywhere on rt.perl.org where one can add a new ticket. There's also no help link I can go to to work out what to do. Shou

Re: [perl #40361] [PATCH] #40278 [CAGE] perl coding standards coda. (cont.)

Jerry, all new rt tickets are created via parrotbug. it may not be sexy, but it's what we've got :-) I'm not 100% sure if it worked, as parrotbug gave this warning: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ./parrotbug line 525, line 7. and the ticket doesn't seem to have

Re: [perl #40361] [PATCH] #40278 [CAGE] perl coding standards coda. (cont.)

On 9/19/06, Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jerry, > all new rt tickets are created via parrotbug. it may not be sexy, but > it's what we've got :-) I'm not 100% sure if it worked, as parrotbug gave this warning: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ./parrotbug

Re: [perl #40361] [PATCH] #40278 [CAGE] perl coding standards coda. (cont.)

On Tuesday 19 September 2006 07:56, jerry gay wrote: > ~  all non-perl test files must have a shebang > > i strongly suggest that this be extended to cover all test files. > then, as you say, it can easily be tested, and it's value can be used > in other tests to determine it's file type. if you w

#parrotsketch logs: 19SEP06

http://www.parrotcode.org/misc/parrotsketch-logs/irclog.parrotsketch-200609/irclog.parrotsketch.20060918 or, for the browser- or email-client- newline-challenged: http://xrl.us/rs3n enjoy. ~jerry

Re: #parrotsketch logs: 19SEP06

/irclog.parrotsketch.20060919 is more interesting. Regards, Bernhard

[perl #40364] [PATCH] line endings of perl .t test files

# New Ticket Created by "Paul Cochrane" # Please include the string: [perl #40364] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40364 > Hi, This patch changes the line endings of the files listed below from dos to unix.

[perl #40367] [TODO] SDL tests

# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch # Please include the string: [perl #40367] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40367 > Some of the SDL examples are still subject of bitrot. Especially the more complex on

[perl #40367] [TODO] SDL tests

Well, I forgot one preliminary: We need a config test first, if SDL is present and working, which shall define: C defines perl5 PARROT_HAS_SDL HAS_SDL PARROT_HAS_SDL_imageHAS_SDL_image (It's not given that libSDL_image is present, *if* libSDL is i