[perl #42155] [PATCH] move members from Parrot_Interp to Parrot_Context

2007-03-28 Thread Alek Storm
# New Ticket Created by "Alek Storm" # Please include the string: [perl #42155] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42155 > This patch moves args_signature, params_signature, returns_signature, current_args, curr

Re: [perl #37997] r10604 build failure on Cygwin

2007-03-28 Thread Ron Blaschke
Joshua Gatcomb wrote: On 3/26/07, Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not sure about the details of this issue, but r17772 seems to build fine on Cygwin. Really? No one on #parrot has been able to get parrot to work on Cygwin for months. Interesting, didn't know about this. The reas

Testing PIRC

2007-03-28 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
hi, Currently, compilers/pircdoes not have a test suite. I'd like to change that, but am not sure how to handle this. My idea was to have the PIR scripts parsed by pirc, which outputs *exactly* the same source (on success), which then should be compiled by IMCC. I'm not sure how to achieve t

Re: [perl #37997] r10604 build failure on Cygwin

2007-03-28 Thread Eric Hanchrow
I use Cygwin and am willing to occasionally test the build on it. Alas I have no clue how to actually -develop- for Cygwin, so I doubt I'd be much help fixing any problems that I find. But I'd be happy to "svn up; perl Configure.pl && make all test" and summarize or post the results. -- I'd like

Re: [perl #42155] [PATCH] move members from Parrot_Interp to Parrot_Context

2007-03-28 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2007 03:14 schrieb Alek Storm: > This patch moves args_signature, params_signature, returns_signature, > current_args, current_params, and current_returns from Parrot_Interp > to Parrot_Context.  This makes the interpreter more reentrant, which > is always a good thing. Nope.

Re: [perl #37997] r10604 build failure on Cygwin

2007-03-28 Thread Nick Glencross
Hi All! On 28/03/07, Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua Gatcomb wrote: > On 3/26/07, Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Not sure about the details of this issue, but r17772 seems to build fine >> on Cygwin. > > Really? No one on #parrot has been able to get parrot to work

[perl #42156] [PATCH] Make invoke() return opcode_t*

2007-03-28 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Steve Peters # Please include the string: [perl #42156] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42156 > In this next round of cleanups, I switched over the invoke() methods to return opcode_t*

Re: [perl #37997] r10604 build failure on Cygwin

2007-03-28 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer
Eric Hanchrow schrieb: I use Cygwin and am willing to occasionally test the build on it. Alas I have no clue how to actually -develop- for Cygwin, so I doubt I'd be much help fixing any problems that I find. But I'd be happy to "svn up; perl Configure.pl && make all test" and summarize or post t

Re: [svn:parrot] r17814 - in trunk: . compilers/pirc

2007-03-28 Thread Will Coleda
Is it me, or did this also change all the paths in MANIFEST.SKIP from win style with backslashes to unix style with slashes? (someone should double check the manifest.skip generator and have it only output slashes.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Author: bernhard Date: Wed Mar 28 10:22:00 2007 N

Re: [perl #42110] [PATCH] Returning values from void functions

2007-03-28 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:42:12AM -0700, Steve Peters via RT wrote: > > Anyway, it's worth noting that although one of functions actually > > doesn't > > return anything, it is documented as returning a PMC *. So either the > > documentation or the function is wrong in parrotobject.pmc and shoul

Re: [perl #37997] r10604 build failure on Cygwin

2007-03-28 Thread Eric Hanchrow
> "Joshua" == Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joshua> Really? No one on #parrot has been able to get parrot to Joshua> work on Cygwin for months. The reason has changed since Joshua> this specific ticket but if you have a working cygwin Joshua> build can you please

Re: [svn:parrot] r17814 - in trunk: . compilers/pirc

2007-03-28 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer
Will Coleda schrieb: Is it me, or did this also change all the paths in MANIFEST.SKIP from win style with backslashes to unix style with slashes? I've seen the same effect. I suppose if stems from the changeset 17760, where tools/dev/mk_manifest_and_skip.pl got a fix for Windows. Under Linux '

Re: [svn:parrot] r17814 - in trunk: . compilers/pirc

2007-03-28 Thread Will Coleda
I don't think there's a problem with the MANIFEST.SKIP either way, but I'd like to avoid unnecessarily large diffs which obscure what was added to the .SKIP file. Bernhard Schmalhofer writes: Will Coleda schrieb: Is it me, or did this also change all the paths in MANIFEST.SKIP from win styl

[svn:parrot-pdd] r17817 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

2007-03-28 Thread jonathan
Author: jonathan Date: Wed Mar 28 14:57:56 2007 New Revision: 17817 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd15_objects.pod Log: [PDD15]: Some extra details to explain the result of one role being composed into another; these mostly mirror what happens when a role is composed into a class. Modifi

Re: [perl #42155] [PATCH] move members from Parrot_Interp to Parrot_Context

2007-03-28 Thread Alek Storm
On 3/28/07, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) This ism't needed, these pointers are only valid and needed up to the next sub call/return. The current_results member already lives in Parrot_Context; this patch just moves the rest of them there as well. Variables can't be global simp

[perl #42161] [BUG] Parrot::Test throws "Can't spawn" warning on windows if a system call returns a negative value

2007-03-28 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay # Please include the string: [perl #42161] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42161 > Parrot::Test throws a "Can't spawn" warning on windows if a system call returns a negative

Re: [perl #37997] r10604 build failure on Cygwin

2007-03-28 Thread Joshua Gatcomb
On 3/28/07, Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua Gatcomb wrote: > Really? No one on #parrot has been able to get parrot to work on Cygwin > for months. Interesting, didn't know about this. The issue for the longest time was that miniparrot.exe would silently die and not even gdb c

[perl #42073] [BUG]: compilers/pirc/Makefile not cleaned up by 'make realclean'

2007-03-28 Thread James Keenan via RT
Patch applied in r17821.