On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> On 9/3/07, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> >
> > > It has biten me so let's make sure invalid --gc options are not allowed.
> >
> > But what if I want to work on --gc=libc? How can I override this?
>
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Tue Aug 28 10:00:38 2007, doughera wrote:
> > On Solaris, I'm getting the following failure in both 107-
> > inter_progs.01.t
> > and .02 .t. I suspect it has to do with the use of callbacks in the
> > Solaris hints file.
>
> Andy: If you g
On 03/09/07, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One other question: Why does the test suite probe over and over again
> for svn, svk, and git? Why can't Configure just look once?
Historical reasons mostly. This same thought has also struck me
recently and I think it would be a good idea
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #45137]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45137 >
Many tests in the Parrot test suite check for the existence of a given
revision control
Can someone explain, please why are there tests that need a version
control system? It sounds strange to me.
Gabor
On 9/3/07, via RT Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
> # Please include the string: [perl #45137]
> # in the subject line of all futu
On 03/09/07, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone explain, please why are there tests that need a version
> control system? It sounds strange to me.
Hrm, after further investigations only t/distro/file_metadata.t uses
svn/svk directly. This test checks to make sure that the svn
pr
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Sep 3 13:00:01 2007 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with mo
On Sep 3, 2007, at 7:48 AM, Andy Dougherty via RT wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
Andy: If you get a chance, could you do a checkout of the
reconfigure
branch (https://svn.perl.org/parrot/branches/reconfigure) and
run: perl
Configure.pl --test --configure_trace ?
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > On Tue Aug 28 10:00:38 2007, doughera wrote:
> > > On Solaris, I'm getting the following failure in both 107-
> > > inter_progs.01.t
> > > and .02 .t. I suspect it has to do with the use of callback
Paul Cochrane wrote:
On 03/09/07, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone explain, please why are there tests that need a version
control system? It sounds strange to me.
Hrm, after further investigations only t/distro/file_metadata.t uses
svn/svk directly. This test checks to make
On Sep 3, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Andy Dougherty via RT wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Andy Dougherty wrote:
Fixing up the @INC paths, I get only four issues: Failures (due to
callbacks) in 107-inter_progs.0[12],
... which is proving to be the most baffling testing problem I've
ever faced (but wil
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> On 02/09/07, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could we get some discussion of the pros and cons of different
> > alternatives?
> >
> > -- Should Configure.pl die when one of its steps fail?
> > -- Should it not die, but exit with a nonzero e
Andy (plus everyone else),
Could you please copy these new versions of
t/configure/107-inter_progs.0?.t to t/configure/ in your sandbox for
trunk and try them out?
Thank you very much.
kid51
107-inter_progs.02.t
Description: Binary data
107-inter_progs.01.t
Description: Binary data
Both the old and new metamodels allow you to set and get an attribute
for a parent class that has the same name as an attribute in the child
class (Perl 6 and .NET both use this feature in different forms). The
old metamodel used this syntax:
# Foo has an attribute named 'j'
newclass $P1,
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Andy (plus everyone else),
>
> Could you please copy these new versions of
> t/configure/107-inter_progs.0?.t to t/configure/ in your sandbox for
> trunk and try them out?
They appear to pass without complaint.
--
Andy Dougherty
Thanks, Andy. Applied to trunk in r21060.
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> On 03/09/07, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can someone explain, please why are there tests that need a version
> > control system? It sounds strange to me.
>
> Hrm, after further investigations only t/distro/file_metadata.t uses
> svn/svk di
Nope. The PDD tickets have to be sorted out as well.
Anyone wants to make a list of 'em, that'd be helpful.
On Sep 1, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
On Mi. 27. Jun. 2007, 07:23:18, coke wrote:
All [RFE] Tickets have been moved.
Coke: Can this ticket be closed?
There a
Here's an issue I hadn't previously spotted in config/inter/progs.pm --
one that was revealed in the coverage analysis
(http://thenceforward.net/parrot/coverage/configure-build/config-inter-progs-pm.html).
In this package's sub runstep(), there is the following code:
# Find a working version
I have finally run out of excuses to delay publishing Kea Common
Lisp, the compiler for Parrot I've been hacking on for years now.
Attached please find a draft of the release announcement and the
README.text file it mentions; these should be enough to download it and
try it out. For those who a
To summarize issues raised in this ticket:
1. Parrot::Configure::runstep() has been renamed
Parrot::Configure::run_single_step().
2. Additional tests have been written for it is quite high
(http://thenceforward.net/parrot/coverage/configure-build/lib-Parrot-Configure-pm.html)
-- but not yet per
Closing ticket; remaining issues will be dealt with in other or new tickets.
22 matches
Mail list logo
