Reini Urban wrote:
You want one patch only against HEAD? That's easy.
But I dislike the idea, as it violates the usage of single tickets.
This is different than the usual case as it's a collection of dependent
patches that can't be evaluated independently. Splitting them out is
actually more
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #58308]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58308 >
Hello.
There is almost copy-pasted version of rindex.
--
Bacek.
commit e23d65f77c
2008/8/23 Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>
>> On #perl6 somebody just asked if there were up-to-date windows builds of
>> parrot somewhere, he had googled for 'parrot windows'. The parrotwin32
>> project didn't show up in his search (but it's first for 'parrot win32').
>>
In a posting to list not in RT, Allison confirmed that 'test_*' files
are being cleaned up properly. So this ticket can be resolved.
No complaints. No smolder test failures. Resolving ticket.
This Smolder report is on the 'newsc' branch.
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/4405
On Sat May 10 20:22:53 2008, coke wrote:
> This make file isn't preprocessed like the standard root.in: it
> assumes perl is in your path, and redefines the list of OPSFILES.
>
> Let's move the step into the core makefile, and add another
> --maintainer tweak like the one for lex/yacc - either run
2008/8/23 François Perrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/8/23 Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>>
>>> On #perl6 somebody just asked if there were up-to-date windows builds of
>>> parrot somewhere, he had googled for 'parrot windows'. The parrotwin32
>>> project didn't show up
Reini Urban wrote:
> 2008/8/23 François Perrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/8/23 Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Moritz Lenz wrote:
On #perl6 somebody just asked if there were up-to-date windows builds of
parrot somewhere, he had googled for 'parrot windows'. The parrotwin32
On Sat Aug 23 06:21:57 2008, mmcleric wrote:
>
> Week is over and release has happened, can this be commited?
> I'm asking because I want to get familiar with submitting process and
> move on to sending new and more interesting patches :)
>
Applied in r30521. I'm running coverage analysis to s
2008/8/24 Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Reini Urban wrote:
>>
>> You want one patch only against HEAD? That's easy.
>> But I dislike the idea, as it violates the usage of single tickets.
>
> This is different than the usual case as it's a collection of dependent
> patches that can't be eval
On Sun Aug 24 09:30:43 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm running coverage analysis to see whether there
> are any new branches/conditions in lib/Parrot/Configure/Compiler.pm
> which need testing.
I never cease to find coverage analysis rewarding for its ability to
enable you to spot dead cod
12 matches
Mail list logo
