On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:31:58AM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> > Oh, argh, so .line now carries the file *and* the line number?.I wanted
> > it to just carry the line number (the clue's in the name... ;-)) and
James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Thu Nov 13 13:57:34 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Thursday 13 November 2008 13:54:36 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>>
>> > At r32625, I am observing this on Darwin/PPC -- but it passes on
>> > Linux/i386. Darwin below.
>>
>> Is the backtrace the same as the
>
> Alan: Any update on this?
>
> Question for any Win32 expert: Is the Borland C compiler worth
> expending Parrot tuits on?
>
The Strawberry Perl route produced results, so I stopped whacking the
horse, on the assumption that it was dead.
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
Is there someone on RedHat or Fedora who could take a whack at this?
I'm unsure what the @make_and@ in the original does, but if it's just
a statement separator, the attached patch should work on Redhat-related
systems, if people have their RP
Nope haven't tried it lately :( You can mark me of the list since I
haven't even opened up that laptop in some time :(
-- Jeff Bisbee / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / jbisbee.multiply.com
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 4:37 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> Have you tried out the pa
Christoph Otto wrote:
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:52:08PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
I'd rather remove the hash seed from the key calculation. Instead,
let's use a global seed (#defined somewhere) as the initial seed,
cache the calculated
You don't want a constant global
Parrot revision: 33133
Test system: Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit (on Intel Core2 Quad)
Compilers tested:
1. Intel C Compiler 9.1.042 32-bit
2. Intel C Compiler 9.1.042 64-bit
3. Intel C Compiler 10.1.015 32-bit
4. Intel C Compiler 10.1.015 64-bit
5. GCC 4.2.4 32-bit
6. GCC 4.2.4 64-bit
Tests and outpu
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Nov 24 14:00:01 2008 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with m
James (>):
> Can you report what results you are currently getting when you run:
> prove -v t/examples/library.t ?
$ prove -v t/examples/library.t
t/examples/library.t
1..4
ok 1 - examples/library/getopt_demo.pir
ok 2 - examples/library/md5sum.pir
7.7
Failed to load libpcre
current instr.: 'pa
Author: jonathan
Date: Mon Nov 24 14:49:30 2008
New Revision: 33162
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod
Log:
[pdd] Add details of how to get bytecode annotations from Exception PMC.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod
=
Author: jonathan
Date: Mon Nov 24 14:50:50 2008
New Revision: 33163
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod
Log:
[pdd] Correction to previous commit; name is just an optional parameter to
annotations, for consistency with e.g. inspect method.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions
Author: jonathan
Date: Mon Nov 24 15:22:49 2008
New Revision: 33166
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[pdd] Document .annotate and .file and update .line directives in the PIR PDD.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
=
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #60798]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60798 >
Here are the headers I get when I receive an email due to my
subscription to [EMAIL PR
On Mon Nov 24 13:45:03 2008, coke wrote:
>
> I'm satisfied that the original request is resolved. There's a lot of
> discussion further down in the ticket which I /think/ can be shelved
> until whenever config is looked at down the road.
>
Agreed. I will take the ticket now and close it in
Moritz confirmed that a related ticket is passing for him, so I'm
stealing this ticket and marking it Resolved.
kid51
On Thu Oct 25 08:18:13 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In t/perl/Parrot_Test.t there is the todo item:
>
> # TODO test run_command()
>
> Do this please :-)
Since RT 46893 calls for testing Parrot::Test in general, I'm going to
merge this ticket into that one.
kid51
On Thu Oct 25 08:20:10 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In t/perl/Parrot_Test.t there are the todo item comments:
>
> # TODO test write_code_to_file(), plan(), skip(), slurp_file()
>
> # test the test functions from Parrot::Test
> # TODO: test the untested test functions
>
> This is all (realistically speak
Test continues to pass, so I'm resolving ticket.
Author: allison
Date: Mon Nov 24 20:30:27 2008
New Revision: 33174
Added:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd14_numbers.pod
- copied unchanged from r33169, /trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd14_bignum.pod
Removed:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd14_bignum.pod
Log:
[pdds] Renaming PDD 14, preparing for merge of
Author: allison
Date: Mon Nov 24 21:32:51 2008
New Revision: 33177
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd14_numbers.pod
Log:
[pdds] Descriptions of the native integer and float types.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd14_numbers.pod
=
Author: allison
Date: Mon Nov 24 21:33:52 2008
New Revision: 33178
Removed:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd04_datatypes.pod
Log:
[pdds] Deleting the now completly redundant datatypes PDD (number 4 is
now available for reuse).
Author: allison
Date: Mon Nov 24 23:41:10 2008
New Revision: 33181
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd14_numbers.pod
Log:
[pdds] Add interface definition for Integer PMC.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd14_numbers.pod
===
22 matches
Mail list logo
