James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Wed Dec 17 13:29:59 2008, kjs wrote:
I thought I closed it last time. Trying again :-)
kjs
The ticket has 3 dependencies which are still open. Is it possible that
the ticket cannot be resolved until these dependencies are resolved?
Yes, but you can just remove
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 18:00:32 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> First we get a couple of warnings fro some files, but then one file
> refuses to compile (see below). I didn't notice any other warnings or
> failures during Configure.pl and/or during compilation.
Thanks for the report.
> src/op
On Thursday 11 December 2008 06:14:36 François PERRAD wrote:
> Since the merge of the branch ppd22io, the mode of the stdin stream has
> changed. Currently, it isn't possible to peek on stdin.
>
> $ cat peek.pir
> .sub 'main'
> $P0 = getstdin
> $S0 = peek $S0
> .end
>
> $
chromatic via RT wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2008 18:00:32 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>> First we get a couple of warnings fro some files, but then one file
>> refuses to compile (see below). I didn't notice any other warnings or
>> failures during Configure.pl and/or during compilation.
>
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 14:53:15 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> I am seeing some new warnings, if I find the time I'll file a new bug on
> those. An easy quick one to fix would be this:
>
> cc: Info: ./include/parrot/sub.h, line 47: Trailing comma found in
> enumerator list. (trailcomma)
> } sub_
chromatic via RT wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 December 2008 14:53:15 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>> I am seeing some new warnings, if I find the time I'll file a new bug on
>> those. An easy quick one to fix would be this:
>>
>> cc: Info: ./include/parrot/sub.h, line 47: Trailing comma found in
>> enume
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 17:31 -0800, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
> chromatic mentioned on #parrot that if we remove PIC, we're going to break
> all the
> predereferenced runcores. After some discussion, this probably means ripping
> out:
>
> 16:42 <@chromatic> Everything other than the default core
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 18:47:23 Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> On the other hand, I'm somewhat concerned that Parrot 1.0 will either
> itself be rather slow, or will architecturally force HLL implementations
> to be slow. While looking for the IRC discussion mentioned by Coke, I
> found the fol
