On 25 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I don't like the C is Hashed::ByValues because it smacks
of spooky action at a distance; I much prefer my notion of C %h{*@x}
= 1. And in Perl 6 I have the horrible feeling that C %h = (*@x =
1) would expand to C %h = (1,2,3 = 1) ,
On 25 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 25 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I don't like the C is Hashed::ByValues because it smacks
of spooky action at a distance; I much prefer my notion of C %h{*@x}
= 1. And in Perl 6 I
Tanton Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TG Does anyone know why I keep getting this:
TG $ cvs diff diff.out
TG cvs server: failed to create lock directory for
`/cvs/public/parrot/Parrot'
TG (/cvs/public/parrot/Parrot/#cvs.lock): No such file or directory
TG cvs server: failed to
Mike,
Part of the beauty of PMCs is that you can have very compact
storage given a dedicated eg int array type. Generating these
would not be a bad thing. The typical case still remains, that
arrays will contained mixtures of all datatypes.
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Mike Lambert wrote:
This patch
I can comment on a bit of this at least :)
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Melvin Smith wrote:
It is not clear to me yet that there needs to be a 1-to-1 correlation
from PMC's to upper level classes.
There won't be. In general, there well be far fewer PMC classes than
upper-level classes.
Also, as
# New Ticket Created by Tanton Gibbs
# Please include the string: [perl #15574]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=15574
This patch implements the AGAIN pmc preprocessor command. AGAIN should be
used
Scott Walters wrote:
Part of the beauty of PMCs is that you can have very compact
storage given a dedicated eg int array type. Generating these
would not be a bad thing. The typical case still remains, that
arrays will contained mixtures of all datatypes.
Yep, I agree. Thus, array.pmc would
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 03:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
my @x is Hashed::ByValues = (1,2,3);
%h = (@x = 1);
@x[1] += 4;
Personally I don't like the C is Hashed::ByValues because it smacks
of spooky action at a distance; I much prefer
Mike,
Was very happy to see your message. People don't often agree with
me. I'm not very agreeable.
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Mike Lambert wrote:
Scott Walters wrote:
Part of the beauty of PMCs is that you can have very compact
storage given a dedicated eg int array type. Generating these
Simon Cozens sent the following bits through the ether:
The mops test for C# in the parrot distribution uses long-integers,
which are 64-bit values, instead of the 32-bit integers used by the
other tests in the directory.
Cool. How do we fix it? Change long to int?
Leon
--
Leon
10 matches
Mail list logo
