Bernhard Schmalhofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
this patch tells CVS about some more generated files.
This should reduce line noise when looking at diffs or when generating
patches.
Thanks, applied.
leo
Two spots in parrotobject.pmc are apparently trying to return something
from a void function. gcc apparently doesn't mind, but non-gcc compilers
might. This simple patch might help the laudanum (AIX) tinderbox.
--- parrot-current/classes/parrotobject.pmc Sat Apr 3 19:00:05 2004
+++
Jens Rieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tar xzf err15.tgz
cd err15
../parrot error.imc
store_sub_in_namespace: sub '__stream_base_onload' namespace #1635018099 too
big
The namespace wasn't cleared correctly. Fixed
Thanks,
leo
Andrew Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, applied.
leo
Andrew Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two spots in parrotobject.pmc are apparently trying to return something
Thanks, applied.
leo
Andrew Dougherty wrote:
Nearly every tinderbox is failing t/pmc/objects.t tests 35-36 with an
error about failing to load 'runtime/parrot/dynext/myops_ops.dylib'
(or equivalent).
Oops sorry cut'n paste error. Fixed.
leo
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Andrew Dougherty wrote:
Nearly every tinderbox is failing t/pmc/objects.t tests 35-36 with an
error about failing to load 'runtime/parrot/dynext/myops_ops.dylib'
(or equivalent).
Oops sorry cut'n paste error. Fixed.
Oh, no problem. I was
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 23:33, chromatic wrote:
With the improved object system in place, I've been porting the existing
SDL Parrot bindings.
Here's a quick status update. With helpful suggestions from Jens and
Allison, I've just finished porting the existing files in examples/sdl
to the new
Andrew Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where in the build process should that file get built? Should the main
Makefile have a line that does something like the following
as part of the test_prep target:
cd dynoplibs ${make_and} $(MAKE) ${make_and} cd ..
That's still another issue.
