Andrew Shitov wrote:
I have no personal web site, so I create the project parrotwin32 on
sourceforge : http://parrotwin32.sourceforge.net/
Cool, and I also promoted it at http://perl6.ru/parrotwin32/.
But an attempt to run perl6.pbc faied:
C:\Program Files\parrot-0.5.0-develbin/parrot.exe
I'm about to turn on the concurrency scheduler runloop in Parrot trunk.
Before I do, I'd like test results on as many platforms as possible
(especially Windows, since it doesn't use POSIX threads).
To test it, edit src/inter_create.c and uncomment the two lines that
start with 'Parrot_cx
On Fri Dec 07 05:10:15 2007, coke wrote:
From PDD22:
Cgetfd retrieves the UNIX integer file descriptor of a stream object.
The opcode has been replaced by a 'get_fd' method on the ParrotIO
object.
--
This ticket is to track the creation of the get_fd method.
Also from PDD22:
Author: coke
Date: Fri Dec 7 05:15:47 2007
New Revision: 23568
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd22_io.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/DEPRECATED.pod
Log:
[docs] Open two tickets to track the deprecation of one item and the feature
that is replacing it
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #48310]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48310
From PDD22:
Cgetfd retrieves the UNIX integer file descriptor of a stream object.
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #48312]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48312
From PDD22:
Cgetfd retrieves the UNIX integer file descriptor of a stream object.
Author: coke
Date: Fri Dec 7 05:05:56 2007
New Revision: 23567
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd22_io.pod
Log:
[docs] Remove reference to will-be-deprecated opcode from pdd which was
apparently already removed.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd22_io.pod
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #48320]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48320
At the bottom of pdd23 there's an example of creating
and throwing an
On Dec 7, 2007 5:23 AM, Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm about to turn on the concurrency scheduler runloop in Parrot trunk.
Before I do, I'd like test results on as many platforms as possible
(especially Windows, since it doesn't use POSIX threads).
To test it, edit
On Nov 29, 2007, at 10:13 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Also, in case it matters, I'm on x86 (32-bit) for this.
Pm
Does it still occur after `ccache -C`? Since ccache uses md5, there's
always the possibility you inadvertently discovered a collision in md5.
Might want to back up
On Friday 07 December 2007 18:09:57 Joshua Juran wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:57 PM, chromatic wrote:
Everything looks reasonable to me, except q{} versus q{ } which are
barely discernable and offers (to my mind) only disadvantages over ''
versus ' ' which is much more distinguishable.
On Friday 07 December 2007 05:23:39 Allison Randal wrote:
I'm about to turn on the concurrency scheduler runloop in Parrot trunk.
Before I do, I'd like test results on as many platforms as possible
(especially Windows, since it doesn't use POSIX threads).
To test it, edit src/inter_create.c
Andy Dougherty wrote:
Whether this is a defect in the vtables_4 test sourcefile for failing to
initialize the vtables, or whether pmc_new ought to be more defensive, I
can't say.
Looks like a bug in the test, as there are other things in Parrot_exit
that won't behave appropriately without an
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Allison Randal wrote:
I'm about to turn on the concurrency scheduler runloop in Parrot trunk. Before
I do, I'd like test results on as many platforms as possible (especially
Windows, since it doesn't use POSIX threads).
To test it, edit src/inter_create.c and uncomment
Author: pmichaud
Date: Fri Dec 7 11:10:06 2007
New Revision: 23575
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod
Log:
[docs]:
* Note non-working code in pdd23, reference RT#48320.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod
On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:57 PM, chromatic wrote:
Everything looks reasonable to me, except q{} versus q{ } which are
barely
discernable and offers (to my mind) only disadvantages over ''
versus ' '
which is much more distinguishable.
Would vs. be a further improvement?
Josh
jerry gay wrote:
looks good to me. commit away!
nice work.
I've got a clean report on our core platform targets, so committed in
r23574. As usual, please report any issues.
Thanks!
Allison
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:45:03PM +0200, Allison Randal wrote:
jerry gay wrote:
looks good to me. commit away!
nice work.
I've got a clean report on our core platform targets, so committed in
r23574. As usual, please report any issues.
r23574 gives me failures in t/src/vtables.t and
18 matches
Mail list logo