On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 01:28:29PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
I posted this to -qa and -internal, since I was suggesting this
for the internal development of perl. Not for the user visible
pieces.
My mistake. For the internals, sounds like it couldn't hurt. Though
I have no idea how put
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wouldn't mind an optional OO contract system in the core of Perl,
but this may be a case of "why do it in core when a module will work?"
I _think_ the proposal was to have design-by-contract in the perl core
in the sense that contract is checked