On Fri 18 May, Damian Conway wrote:
>
> Ed wrote:
>
>
>> Can 'undef' valued thingys have properties
>
> Yes.
>
>> and functions?
>
> No.
>
Why not?
Richard
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ed wrote:
> Any ideas on how to handle this with the 'is' keyword? I was
> reading the slashdot comments to Exegesis II, and this seemed to be
> the one issue that had merit. A couple of the posters bemoaned the
> fact that they were debugging PL/I about 25 years ago, and had code
Any ideas on how to handle this with the 'is' keyword? I was reading the
slashdot comments to Exegesis II, and this seemed to be the one issue that had
merit. A couple of the posters bemoaned the fact that they were debugging PL/I
about 25 years ago, and had code that depended on some obscure pro
