Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
Ok, how about this: Is there a reason Inot to? Or
should I not go there?
Off hand, it sounds expensive. I don't see a way to only let
the people who use it incur the penalty, but my vision isn't
the best in the world.
It should be possible to define the
At 10:53 AM -0700 10/21/02, Austin Hastings wrote:
Yeah, but emacs isn't written in any of those languages.
What, you're using emacs as an argument *for* something? :-P
And, FWIW, emacs is written in C. Granted a much macro-mutated
version of C, but C nonetheless.
--- Dan Sugalski [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Whipp) writes:
It should be possible to define the bookmark methods on the basic string
class to rebless the object onto a more powerful subclass.
That makes it a doubly good candidate for modulehood.
--
It's 106 miles from Birmingham, we've got an eighth of a tank
At 7:22 PM + 10/21/02, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote :
And, FWIW, emacs is written in C. Granted a much macro-mutated
version of C, but C nonetheless.
Just like Perl 5 ;-)
Almost. At least perl 5's macros look like C. Emacs' macro horrors
make C look like Lisp...
--
I didn't call the problem unreasonable, I was objecting to its
characterization as an essential feature. It isn't. A useful thing,
definitely, but there are a lot of those. It's hardly essential any
more than, say, a hash that automagically maps to the current
directory's files
Dan Sugalski wrote :
And, FWIW, emacs is written in C. Granted a much macro-mutated
version of C, but C nonetheless.
Just like Perl 5 ;-)
The Perl6 OO Cookbook, v0.2 is online.
http://cog.cognitivity.com/perl6/
Changes include:
[] *Much* better accuracy in most of the early recipes (better matching
to Apos/Exes and perl6-language: see the 'Status' fields of each
recipe.) More fixes coming very soon.
[] Ability to annotate
