Re: *Tap Tap*

2003-06-09 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:56:06AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: Is this thing on? No messages since last Wednesday. Which admittedly makes a summarizer's life a good deal easier... It looks like it is. However, your life may be easier this week only, given that many armed and dangerous minds

Re: *Tap Tap*

2003-06-09 Thread Piers Cawley
Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 09:56:06AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: Is this thing on? No messages since last Wednesday. Which admittedly makes a summarizer's life a good deal easier... It looks like it is. However, your life may be easier this week only,

Re: This week's summary

2003-06-09 Thread Adam Turoff
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:26:22PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: Multimethod dispatch? Adam Turoff asked if multimethod dispatch (MMD) was really *the* Right Thing (it's definitely *a* Right Thing) and suggested that it would be more Perlish to allow the programmer to override the

Re: This week's summary

2003-06-09 Thread Sean O'Rourke
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Adam Turoff wrote: - roll-your-own inheritance mechanisms (see NEXT.pm) On a related note, you might also want to take a look at CLOS (the Common Lisp Object System) where it talks about method selection. They've got a pretty clear and general model that describes every

Re: This week's summary

2003-06-09 Thread Mark A. Biggar
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:26:22PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: Multimethod dispatch? Assuming I'm not misunderstanding what Adam is after, this has come up before (I think I asked about value based dispatch a few months back) and I can't remember if the decision was that MMD didn't

Re MMD [was Re: This week's summary]

2003-06-09 Thread Michael Lazzaro
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 07:13 AM, Adam Turoff wrote: On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:26:22PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: Assuming I'm not misunderstanding what Adam is after, this has come up before (I think I asked about value based dispatch a few months back) and I can't remember if

Re: MMD [was Re: This week's summary]

2003-06-09 Thread Michael Lazzaro
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 09:19 AM, Mark A. Biggar wrote: On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:26:22PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: multi factorial (0) { 1 } multi factorial ($n) { $n * factorial($n - 1) } That's a bad example, as it's really not MMD. It's a partially pre-memoized function

Re: MMD [was Re: This week's summary]

2003-06-09 Thread Michael Lazzaro
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 03:45 PM, Dave Whipp wrote: Michael Lazzaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote multi bar (Foo $self, int $i : ); # semicolon optional pedantic I think you meant colon optional. The semi-colon is, I think, a syntax error. You need the yada-yada-yada thing: {...}.

This week's summary

2003-06-09 Thread Piers Cawley
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20030608 It's another Monday, it's another summary and I need to get this finished so I can starting getting the house in order before we head off to Boca Raton and points north and west on the long road to Portland, Oregon. Via Vermont. (I'm