Re: Is there a tuple? -- WAS: RE: :)

2004-08-17 Thread Larry Wall
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 08:43:19AM -0700, Austin Hastings wrote: : --- Adam D. Lopresto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : The modifier to turn off warnings on a line would be ;), winking at : us to let us know it's up to something. : : I wondered about paren-after-semi, and thought about Cfor(;;).

Re: Revision of A12's lookahead notions

2004-08-17 Thread David Storrs
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 11:07:59AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: 2) In the absence of evidence to the contrary, methods always assume they have *no* arguments. For methods: 2a) A method not followed by a left paren or colon has no arguments. Just checking--whitespace

Re: Revision of A12's lookahead notions

2004-08-17 Thread Smylers
David Storrs writes: On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 11:07:59AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: 2) In the absence of evidence to the contrary, methods always assume they have *no* arguments. For methods: 2a) A method not followed by a left paren or colon has no arguments. Just

Re: Revision of A12's lookahead notions

2004-08-17 Thread Larry Wall
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 06:02:13PM +, Smylers wrote: : David Storrs writes: : Just checking--whitespace doesn't count, right? : : foo(1,2,3);# Func with 3 args : foo (1,2,3); # Same exact thing : : You quote Larry's text about methods, then give an example using :

Re: Revision of A12's lookahead notions

2004-08-17 Thread chromatic
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 12:54, Larry Wall wrote: But we'll just have to shoot anyone who makes a wisecrack like: use parens :lisp; Surely that should have its own pragma: use parenths; -- c