svnbot6 r6401 | iblech++ | *%slurpy_hashes exist :)
svnbot6 r6401 | iblech++ | It uses the semantics of
svnbot6 r6401 | iblech++ |
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.language/22860, i.e.
svnbot6 r6401 | iblech++ | sub foo (*%hash) {...}, foo(hash =
{...}); # works
svnbot6
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 06:05:06PM +0800, Yiyi Hu wrote:
: svnbot6 r6401 | iblech++ | *%slurpy_hashes exist :)
: svnbot6 r6401 | iblech++ | It uses the semantics of
: svnbot6 r6401 | iblech++ |
: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.language/22860, i.e.
: svnbot6 r6401 | iblech++ |
On 8/22/05, Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the simplest thing is to say that you can't bind to the name
of the slurpy hash. You give a name to it so that you can refer to it
inside, but that name is not visible to binding.
Fixed in https://svn.perl.org/perl6/doc. Thanks.
Luke
Just my two cents then back to lurking. The idea of having named parameters
with different names than the variables ++. Otherwise your public API is
dependent on private variables which is a Bad Thing and the only thing that
realy bugged me about current named parameters in P6.
BTW why is it
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 06:42:04PM +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote:
: On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 08:27:38 -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
:
: Plus I still think it's a really bad idea to allow intermixing of
: positionals and named. We could allow named at the beginning or end
: but still keep a constraint
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:51:25AM -0600, Eric wrote:
: Just my two cents then back to lurking. The idea of having named parameters
: with different names than the variables ++. Otherwise your public API is
: dependent on private variables which is a Bad Thing and the only thing that
: realy
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:54:36 -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
That's not a problem as long as you keep your positionals together.
Oh, I assumed the it's
/(named* positionals*)|(positionals* named*)/,
not
/named* positionals* named*/
: If there is some really odd code signature
my( $s, $t ); $s = value t is $t; $t = xyz; print $s;
in perl 5, it will give a warning, and won't do right thing.
we have to use other way or eval '$s' before print to get a correct answer.
So I wonder, If we can make $scalar lazy also. As array now is lazy by default.
Even if making scalar
Hi,
on #perl6, we were wondering how to use() modules from foreign
languages which have an incompatible identifier syntax. E.g.:
use perl5:Foo::Bar; # fine, no problem
# Load JavaScript modules from JSAN
use jsan:Test.Simple; # should we simply accept the dot, or...
Hi,
Larry Wall wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 10:33:03PM +, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
: S02 says:
: our $a; say $::(a); # works
:
: my $a; say $::(a); # dies, you should use:
: my $a; say $::(MY::a); # works
That looks like somebody's relic of Perl 5 thinking.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 20:35:40 +, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
Hi,
on #perl6, we were wondering how to use() modules from foreign
languages which have an incompatible identifier syntax. E.g.:
use perl5:Foo::Bar; # fine, no problem
# Load JavaScript modules from JSAN
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:51:53PM +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
: If we go with these changes, this functionality (starting place for a
: search) would be available by using
:
: Foo::Bar$symbol_to_lookup; # right?
Presumably, though Foo::Bar differs from OUTER in that, for packages,
the
Hi,
Yiyi Hu wrote:
my( $s, $t ); $s = value t is $t; $t = xyz; print $s;
in perl 5, it will give a warning, and won't do right thing.
we have to use other way or eval '$s' before print to get a correct
answer.
So I wonder, If we can make $scalar lazy also. As array now is lazy by
default.
On 8/22/05, Yiyi Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my( $s, $t ); $s = value t is $t; $t = xyz; print $s;
I have an answer for you that is much more detailed than what you want
to hear. The short answer is yes.
This is possible to implement, provided you appropriately declare $t.
It all depends on
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:09:29AM +0800, Yiyi Hu wrote:
: my( $s, $t ); $s = value t is $t; $t = xyz; print $s;
: in perl 5, it will give a warning, and won't do right thing.
: we have to use other way or eval '$s' before print to get a correct answer.
:
: So I wonder, If we can make $scalar
On Monday 22 August 2005 04:25 pm, Larry Wall wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:09:29AM +0800, Yiyi Hu wrote:
[stuff]
: Even if making scalar lazy might cause problem sometimes, Is it
: possible to add a property which is like
: my $var is lazy; to handle these situation?
In Perl 6 you make
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-08-15 through 2005-08-22
All~
Welcome to another monday summary, which hopefully provides some
evidence that mondays can get better. It always feels like writing
summaries is an uphill battle, perhaps I should switch to writing about
Perl 6 Language
17 matches
Mail list logo
