On 2/5/07, David Green wrote:
Then we wouldn't need * to count backwards, although it's still
useful to allow us to count past the end of an array. There are all
sorts of variations on this scheme, such as whether * is the last
element or the one after that, etc., or whether 0 should be the
fi
On 1/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in "[svn:perl6-synopsis] r13549
- doc/trunk/design/syn":
+It has become the custom to use negative subscripts to indicate counting
+from the end of an array. This is still supported, but only for unshaped
+arrays:
+For shaped arrays you must explicitly refer t
Author: larry
Date: Mon Feb 5 15:07:01 2007
New Revision: 13572
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
$obj.Foo::bar is also okay syntax if Foo declared
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/d
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:41:06PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: typo from albery_b++
Figured I'd start in on all the possible misspellings now... O_o
Larry
Author: larry
Date: Mon Feb 5 14:41:04 2007
New Revision: 13571
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Log:
typo from albery_b++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod(ori
On Feb 5, 2007, at 17:26 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+This can be viewed as a form of multiple dispatch, except that it's
+based on longest-token matching rather than signature matcing. The
"matcing"?
--
brandon s. allbery[linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
system administ
Author: larry
Date: Mon Feb 5 14:26:23 2007
New Revision: 13570
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Log:
categories now allow multiple dispatch via longest-token rule
added : syntax to rules and tokens
seems a bit odd to call list-associative operators "bina
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:31:17PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: larry
> Date: Tue Jan 30 12:31:16 2007
> New Revision: 13551
>
> Modified:
>doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
>
> Log:
> Braino spotted by TSa++
>
>
> Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
> ===
