Author: lwall
Date: 2009-02-07 08:50:27 +0100 (Sat, 07 Feb 2009)
New Revision: 25226
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-functions.pod
Log:
missing commas
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-functions.pod
===
--- docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-function
On 2009 Feb 6, at 6:24, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Sex, 2009-02-06 às 02:07 -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH escreveu:
I would think fcntl() is just the Unix version of a more general
concept, which is probably wider than POSIX.
Maybe this wider concepts can be expressed in their own roles, as
alr
Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
>Also, is there a simple way to know when I should be using a class
> vs. a role?
If you plan on creating objects with it, use a class. If you plan on
creating classes with it, use a role.
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
On 2009 Feb 5, at 13:51, Larry Wall wrote:
Pity that -F specifies the ground. Hey, I know, let's make -G the
figure, that makes about as much sense as -x vs +x, or electrons
vs positrons... :)
Someone's been rereading _Gödel,_Escher,_Bach_?
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,h
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-02-07 00:27:35 +0100 (Sat, 07 Feb 2009)
New Revision: 25223
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
refactor pseudo-package names
clarify use of protoobjects as responder to subcall interface
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
=
Quick question about implementing things like the DBI/DBD split in
Perl6. In Perl5, you have code in DBI that essentially says:
-
$driverpackage = "DBD::$driver";
eval "use $driverpackage; \$obj = $driverpackage->new(\%params);";
-
This has always seemed ugly to me. Is there
Em Sex, 2009-02-06 às 02:07 -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH escreveu:
> >> +=head2 IO::POSIX
> >> +
> >> +Indicates that this object can perform standard posix IO operations.
> > I don't like that wording, but getting it right seems tricky.
> Do we want/need to deal with POSIX conformance levels?
