Em Seg, 2009-08-03 às 11:04 +1000, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> However, my main reason for modifying it was that I needed actions for
> what I'm doing. So I'll keep working on that.
http://gist.github.com/161467
just to tease :) -- this making the grammar closer to the XML spec...
dani
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Let's pick up this old mail before it gets completely warnocked ;-)
>
> For the record, this discussion only applies to scalar implementation
> types. For example for Arrays I expect things to work by overriding the
> method postcircumfix:<[ ]>
