I like that I can start with a fairly simple subset of Perl 6 but pick up more
as I go along, if it’s needed.
chris
On Jun 16, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Paweł Murias
pawelmur...@gmail.commailto:pawelmur...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Perl 6 tries to include too much rather than too little.
It will be
the parsing process is somewhat stream-like, the OS will take
care of swapping in chunks as you need them. You don't even need anything
special to support backtracking -- it's just a memory address, after all.
-Martin
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Fields, Christopher J wrote:
Yeah, I'm thinking of a Cat
that use case, because it takes on the role of a session/lifetime
object for the parse process itself.
// Carl
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Fields, Christopher J
cjfie...@illinois.edu wrote:
On Aug 13, 2014, at 8:11 AM, Christopher Fields cjfie...@illinois.edu
wrote:
On Aug 13, 2014, at 4
I have a fairly simple question regarding the feasibility of using grammars
with commonly used biological data formats.
My main question: if I wanted to parse() or subparse() vary large files (not
unheard of to have FASTA/FASTQ or other similar data files exceed 100’s of GB)
would a grammar
On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:50 AM, Solomon Foster colo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Fields, Christopher J
cjfie...@illinois.edu wrote:
I have a fairly simple question regarding the feasibility of using grammars
with commonly used biological data formats.
My main question
On Aug 13, 2014, at 8:11 AM, Christopher Fields cjfie...@illinois.edu wrote:
On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:50 AM, Solomon Foster colo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Fields, Christopher J
cjfie...@illinois.edu wrote:
I have a fairly simple question regarding the feasibility
On Apr 22, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Damian Conway dam...@conway.org wrote:
It's an awesome language, which is exactly the problem. Inspiring
awe is not far from inducing panic and terror, especially in people
who aren't feeling too confident in the first place. We want to be
accessible to the people
