Re: ./method defunct

2005-06-20 Thread Kurt
I see this syntax the less I like it, so I wanted to add another voice to the dissention. However, if it remains official, I expect I'll simply be naming my invocants, as chromatic has suggested. Kurt

Re: ./method defunct

2005-06-20 Thread Kurt
On 6/20/05, Juerd wrote: Or you can just get your self with a simple (module that does) macro self () { '$?SELF' } And you could do the same for `./`. Kurt

Re: Context of hash slices; quotation adverbs

2005-04-18 Thread Kurt Hutchinson
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 11:23:34PM +0300, Roie Marianer wrote: That makes sense, but that would make %num_of_linesfile = @file not DWIM... of course that would translate into %num_of_linesfile = scalar @file so maybe that's OK. In order to promote proper syntactical thinking, note that

Re: This week's summary

2004-07-26 Thread Kurt Starsinic
- Kurt

Re: Unicode in Emacs (was: Semantics of vector operations)

2004-02-04 Thread Kurt Starsinic
On Feb 03, David Wheeler wrote: On Feb 3, 2004, at 7:13 AM, Kurt Starsinic wrote: No joke. You'll need to have the mule-ucs module installed. A quick Google search turns up plenty of sources. Oh, I have Emacs 21.3.50. Mule is gone. I'm afraid you're on your own, then. I'm using

Re: Semantics of vector operations

2004-02-03 Thread Kurt Starsinic
On Feb 02, David Wheeler wrote: On Feb 2, 2004, at 9:53 PM, Kurt Starsinic wrote: I realize this is a tad OT, but can anyone tell me how I can get Emacs to properly display Unicode characters? I expect that others on the list could benefit, too. (require 'un-define) Since I really

Re: Protocols

2003-07-25 Thread Kurt Starsinic
. It should assert that it implements it. - Kurt

Re: Protocols

2003-07-24 Thread Kurt Starsinic
, and their ur-name is protocols. - Kurt

Re: Perl and *ML

2003-03-26 Thread Kurt Starsinic
much ;). DAGs wouldn't enough though, most XML tree representations aren't really trees, they're very cyclic. Pardon me? Could you please provide an example? - Kurt

Re: Unicode operators

2002-11-07 Thread Kurt D. Starsinic
On Nov 07, Dan Sugalski wrote: Lacking a decent C++ compiler isn't necessarily a strike against VMS--to be a strike against, there'd actually have to *be* a decent C++ compiler... Doesn't VMS have a /bin/false? - Kurt