additional checks. However, if
the parent's preconditions apply to the child invariably, it would be
rather difficult to make your subclass accept a wider variety of input.
I'm not proposing a solution, but rather just a problem to keep in mind.
Mike Lambert
in the opposite direction, they don't quite gel with that particular
proposal.
Mike Lambert
?
Mike Lambert
)
$a = (1,2,3)
($a) = 1,2,3
Do you still believe those should be identical? They have the same
problems mentioned above, and likely other issues as well.
Mike Lambert
*will* arise in practice.
Mike Lambert
the implementation phase and realize the scope of the project. :)
Thanks,
Mike Lambert
in the forest to the surrounding
mountains, however. Rainbows with a pot of gold at the mountainous end?
Telescopes on the ground which can be moved and rotated?
Mike Lambert
with the
Perl5 solution above, and I would argue that it should stay that way,
since it's not exactly the same type.
Mike Lambert
Luke Palmer wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 19:51:39 -0600 (MDT)
From: Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Methods, and such
It seems
of course breaks when you remove the first loop. I always found that
annoying...and that's what the following was used for, in those compilers:
#define for if(0) {} else for
Mike Lambert
want to come up with
a better variable name, however.
Just trying to contribute something new to the discussion that hasn't been
mentioned a dozen times already... :)
Mike Lambert
think I'll stop here, as I think I've said more than enough.
Mike Lambert
. This means that in order for an object
to be able to have equality work in hashtables, from two objects
constructed at different points in time, they'd need to overload the
operator:hash() function to return a string.
Or has this matter been thought through already?
Thanks,
Mike Lambert
Aaron Sherman
12 matches
Mail list logo
