> Given the recent explosion of svn commits in the synopses, and the fact that
> the versions of the synopses on the dev.perl.org/perl6 site are lagging a
> bit, would it make sense to add a link to the svn site to the
> Synopses page?
I'd rather not.
The ones on the dev site shouldn't have be
> The definitive answer is +< -- the pod document at
> http://dev.perl.org/perl6/synopsis/S03.html is out of date.
> This has been corrected in the perl6 svn repository for some time
> (http://svn.perl.org/perl6/doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod), but I don't
> know the magic for getting updates in the
From: O'Reilly Conferences <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OSCON Call For Proposals Now Open
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:30:03 -0800
The Call for Proposals has just opened for the
7th Annual O'Reilly Open Source Convention
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2005/
OSCON is headed back to friendly, ec
>How about my original inclinaton: "perg"? It just screams out "the
>opposite of grep".
So it greps a list in reverse order?
-R (who does not see any benefit of 'perg' over grep { ! code } )
>Ah... that would explain why I haven't seen it then. Looks like
>someone broke perl6-all.
No, it was just "not configured".
Future messages to perl6-documentation should end up on perl6-all.
-R
Chip Salzenberg writes:
>Ouch. I gather, then, that nntp.perl.org does not house complete list
>archives, or else the discussion was not on p6-language ... ?
It should have complete archives. It uses the same backend data as
the html version on archive.develooper.com.
TJ> The month and day indices should stay zero since they are array
TJ> indices. The manual will reflect this.
[rspier@localhost rspier]$ perl -wle 'print +(localtime)[3] '
31
To what index do you refer?
month days are currently 1 based.
_consistency_ would be nice, C be dammed.
I propose "c
